SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN THE PRACTICE OF THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES
Abstract
High quality epidemiological data are vital for planning effective public health preventive strategies, providing health care services and evaluation of their effectiveness. Systematic reviews provide a summary of the results of carefully selected studies in a methodologically defined reproducible process. Authors of this article will present their experiences with the living systematic review of the epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries in Europe developed within the international project CENTER-TBI using the standardized methods.
References
Andelic, N. (2013). The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Lancet Neurol, 12(1), 28-29. DOI:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70294-6. [in English].
Brazinova, A., Rehorcikova, V., Taylor, M. S., Buckova, V., Majdan, M., Psota, M., Peeters, W., Feigin, V., Theadom, A., Holkovic, L., & Synnot, A. (2016). Epidemiology of Traumatic Brain Injury in Europe: A Living Systematic Review. Journal Neurotrauma, Epub ahead of print. DOI:10.1089/neu.2015.4126. [in English].
Brazinova, A., Zelinkova, V., Taylor, M. S., Majdan, M., Peeters, W., Feigin, V., Theadom, A., Donoghue, E., Brooker, J., & Synnot, A. (2018). Supplementary data. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/suppl/10.1089/neu. 2015. 4126/suppl_file/Supp_Data.pdf. [in English].
CENTER-TBI. (2018). CENTER-TBI - Project Overview. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://www.center-tbi.eu/. [in English].
Clarke, M., & Chalmers, I. (2018). Reflections on the history of systematic reviews. BMJ Evid Based Med, 23(4), 121-122. DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110968. [in English].
Cochrane Community. (2018). Living systematic reviews. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://community.cochrane.org/review-production/production-resources/living-systematic-reviews. [in English].
COCHRANE. (2018a). Evidence. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://www.cochrane.org/evidence. [in English].
COCHRANE. (2018b). What is a systematic review? [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://consumers.cochrane.org/what-systematic-review. [in English].
COVIDENCE. (2018). Better systematic review management. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://www.covidence.org/home. [in English].
Drucker, A. M., Fleming, P., & Chan, A.-W. (2016). Research Techniques Made Simple: Assessing Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 136(11), e109-e114. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.08.021. [in English].
EBRN. (2018). About the EBRNetwork. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://ebrnetwork.org/about/. [in English].
Eden, J., Levit, L., Berg, A. O., & Morton, S. (2011). Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press. [in English].
Elliott, J. H., Synnot, A., Turner, T., Simmonds, M., Akl, E. A., McDonald, S., Salanti, G., Meerpohl, J., MacLehose, H., Hilton, J., Tovey, D., Shemilt, I., & Thomas, J. (2017). Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how. Journal Clin Epidemiol, 91, 23-30. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010. [in English].
Elliott, J. H., Turner, T., Clavisi, O., Thomas, J., Higgins, J. P., Mavergames, C., &
European Commission. (2015). Causes of death — standardised death rate, EU-28, 2015. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Causes_of_death_%E2%80%94_standardised_death_rate,_EU-28,_2015_(per_100_000_inhabitants)_HLTH18.png. [in English].
Gruen, R. L. (2014). Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap. PLoS Med, 11(2), e1001603. DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603. [in English].
Higgins, J., Lasserson, T., Chandler, J., Tovey, D., & Churchill, R. (2016). Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Review. London: Cochrane. [in English].
Ioannidis, J. P., Greenland, S., Hlatky, M. A., Khoury, M. J., Macleod, M. R., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Tibshirani, R. (2014). Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. The Lancet, 383(9912), 166-175. [in English].
Koskinen, S., & Alaranta, H. (2008). Traumatic brain injury in Finland 1991-2005: a nationwide register study of hospitalized and fatal TBI. Brain Inj, 22(3), 205-214. DOI:10.1080/02699050801938975. [in English].
Leibson, C. L., Brown, A. W., Ransom, J. E., Diehl, N. N., Perkins, P. K., Mandrekar, J., & Malec, J. F. (2011). Incidence of traumatic brain injury across the full disease spectrum: a population-based medical record review study. Epidemiology, 22(6), 836-844. DOI:10.1097/EDE.0b013e318231d535. [in English].
Lind, J. (1753). A treatise on the scurvy: in three parts, containing an inquiry into the nature, causes, and cure, of that disease: A. Millar. [in English].
Maas, A. I. R., Harrison-Felix, C. L., Menon, D., Adelson, P. D., Balkin, T., Bullock, R., Engel, D. C., Gordon, W., Langlois-Orman, J., Lew, H. L., Robertson, C., Temkin, N., Valadka, A., Verfaellie, M., Wainwright, M., Wright, D. W., & Schwab, K. (2011). Standardizing data collection in traumatic brain injury. Journal Neurotrauma, 28(2), 177-187. DOI:10.1089/neu.2010.1617. [in English].
Maas, A. I., Menon, D. K., Steyerberg, E. W., Citerio, G., Lecky, F., Manley, G. T., Hill, S., Legrand, V., & Sorgner, A. (2015). Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): a prospective longitudinal observational study. Neurosurgery, 76(1), 67-80. DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000000575. [in English].
Menon, D. K., & Maas, A. I. (2015). Traumatic brain injury in 2014. Progress, failures and new approaches for TBI research. Nat Rev Neurol, 11(2), 71-72. DOI:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.261. [in English].
Menon, D. K., Schwab, K., Wright, D. W., & Maas, A. I. (2010). Position Statement: Definition of Traumatic Brain Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(11), 1637-1640. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.017. [in English].
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med, 151(4), 264-269, w264. [in English].
Murad, M. H., Asi, N., Alsawas, M., & Alahdab, F. (2016). New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med, 21(4), 125-127. DOI:10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401. [in English].
NIHR. (2018). PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#aboutpage. [in English].
Popescu, C., Anghelescu, A., Daia, C., & Onose, G. (2015). Actual data on epidemiological evolution and prevention endeavours regarding traumatic brain injury. Journal of Medicine and Life, 8(3), 272-277. [in English].
Rehorčíková, V., Bražinová, A., Majdan, M., Taylor, M. S., & Rusnák, M. (2016). Európsky projekt CENTER-TBI: Komplexný prístup k diagnostike a liečbe úrazov mozgu v Európe. Lekarsky Obzor, 65(10), 368-360. [in Slovak].
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72. [in English].
Shamliyan, T. A., Kane, R. L., Ansari, M. T., Raman, G., Berkman, N. D., Grant, M., Janes, G., Maglione, M., Moher, D., Nasser, M., Robinson, K. A., Segal, J. B., & Tsouros, S. (2011). AHRQ Methods for Effective Health Care Development of Quality Criteria To Evaluate Nontherapeutic Studies of Incidence, Prevalence, or Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases: Pilot Study of New Checklists. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). [in English].
Synnot, A., Gruen, R. L., Menon, D., Steyerberg, E. W., Buki, A., Peul, W. C., Elliott, J. H., & Maas, A. (2016). A New Approach to Evidence Synthesis in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Living Systematic Review. Journal Neurotrauma, Epub ahead of print. DOI:10.1089/neu.2015.4124. [in English].
Whiting, P., Savović, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Caldwell, D. M., Reeves, B. C., Shea, B., Davies, P., Kleijnen, J., Churchill, R., & group, R. (2016). ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal Clin Epidemiol, 69, 225-234. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005. [in English].
WHO. (2005). Bridging the “know-do” gap: meeting on knowledge translation in global health. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://www.measureevaluation.org/ resources/training/capacity-building-resources/high-impact-research-training-curricula/bridging-the-know-do-gap.pdf. [in English].
WHO. (2014). WHO handbook for guideline development – 2nd edition. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://ebm.bmj.com/content/23/4/121.long. [in English].
Abstract views: 456 PDF Downloads: 191