Keywords: metamodernism, automodernism, hypermodernism, altermodernism, digimodernism, performatism


Today, the relevance of the study of theories of postpostmodernism is due to several factors. Historically, we can observe the changes taking place in the development of society in connection with the origin and formation of different eras. Also, under these influences, the cultural, social, psychological, moral and technological spheres of life are transformed. We are now on the verge of a new era, and therefore an important aspect is the study of its key aspects. The article considers the problem of modern society regarding the definition and derivation of the concept of culture at this stage of the development of civilization. The main idea of the article is the alleged end of postmodernism and the obvious emergence of some new modernism. The article is devoted to a detailed review and analysis of the main postpostmodern foreign concepts of the modern cultural paradigm. Data are presented on theories such as metamodernism, hypermodernism, alternativemodernism, digital modernism, automodernism and performatism. After reviewing and analyzing many different cultural phenomena that arise in this period, we can conclude that it would be unambiguous to reject one theory and put another in its place. Each of the theories has pronounced distinctive characteristics based on real factors and emphasizing the characteristic changes in the emergence of a new era. Therefore, it is advisable to look at the concepts presented through the prism of complexity, then a qualitative and complete perception of the surrounding reality will develop.


1. Bespalaya, O. (2014). Posle postmoderna: al’termodern, transmodern, postpostmodern…. [After postmodern: altermodern, transmodern, post-postmodern…] Gumanitarny’e, soczial’no-e’konomicheskie i obshhestvenny’e nauki., 1-6. URL: (in Russian)
2. Elistratova, L. (2007). Fiziologicheskaya fantaziya. [Physiological fantasy] Vremya. URL:http:// (in Russian)
3. Kirby, A. (2006). The Death of Postmodernism and Beyond. Philosophy Now. URL: https:// (in English)
4. Komarniczkaya, L. (2009). Al’termodern poluchil global’ny’j status. [Alterodern gains global status] Live Jounal. URL: (in Russian)
5. Kuzneczov A. Yu. (2019) Do genezi metamoderni’zmu. [Towards the genesis of metamodernism] Humanities Journal. 7–17. doi:10.32620/gch.2019.1.01 (in Ukrainian)
6. Lipoveczki, Zh. (2013). Vy’soka kul’tura vs. massovaya kul’tura. [High culture vs mass culture] URL: (in Russian)
7. Mitroshenkov, O. (2016). Chto pridet na smenu postmodernizmu? [What will replace postmodernism?] URL: (in Russian)
8. Nechaev, I. (2010). Avtomodernizm kak napravlenie zapadnoj kul’turofilosofii. [Automodernism as a direction of Western cultural philosophy] Nauchny’e trudy’ Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 119. URL: (in Russian)
9. Osipova, O N. (2014). Postmodernistkij sindrom: kul’turny’j shok ili "dolgoe proshhanie"? [Postmodern Syndrome: Culture Shock or Long Goodbye?] Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 11-15. (in Russian)
10. Pavlov, A. (2019). Vidy’ postpostmodernizma. [Types of post-postmodernism] URL: https:// (in Russian)
11. Postpostmodernism. (2020). In Vikipedia. [Postpostmodernism] URL: wiki/Постпостмодернизм (in Russian)
12. Tormakhova, A. (2016). Iskusstvo v teoriyakh post-postmodernizma. [Art in post-postmodern theories] Studia Culturae, 1(27), 18-26. URL: viewFile/699/694. (in Russian)
13. Vermyulen, T, & Akker, R v. (2015). Zametki o metamodernizme. [Notes on Metamodernism] URL: (in Russian)
14. Vermeulen, T., & Akker, R. V. (2010). Notes of metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture., 1-14. URL: (in English)

Abstract views: 90
PDF Downloads: 35
How to Cite
Babko, K., & Kome, A. (2021). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POSTPOSTMODERN METHODOLOGICAL CLAIMS. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 39(2), 26-33.