EU CULTURAL POLICY AND SOCIETY PARTICIPATION : REVIEW OF THE RECENT LITERATURE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Słowa kluczowe: cultural heritage, cultural participation, participatory governance, social integration, European Union.

Abstrakt

Cultural heritage, cultural policy and cultural participation are crucial topics for the European Union (EU) participatory governance and social integration. The purpose of the paper is to conduct and develop conceptual and legal research on the EU documentation in the field of cultural policy, cultural heritage and cultural participation engaging a three-step research plan: (1) the appraisal of the recent literature in the field; (2) the broad interdisciplinary approach to the relevant doctrinal and latest legal advances; (3) the policy and societal contexts influencing the citizen participatory actions. The added value of the research is related to the identification of the inner concepts and processes influencing participatory governance and social integration: cultural assets, historical and social structures and areas, cultural goods, conservation management and participatory governance.

Wykaz bibliografii

1. Baird, K., Harrison, G. & Reeve, R. (2007). Success of activity management practices: the influence of organizational and cultural factors. Accounting & Finance, 47: 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2006.00195.x
2. Batteau, A.W. & Villegas, G.C. (2016). Cultural Change Management in Organizations from Competing Perspectives. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2016: 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1559-8918.2016.01074
3. Chiabai, A., Paskaleva, K. & Lombardi, P. (2013). e-Participation Model for Sustainable Cultural Tourism Management: a Bottom-Up Approach. Int. J. Tourism Res., 15: 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.871
4. Crowley, K., Jackson, R., O'Connell, S., Karunarthna, D., Anantasari, E., Retnowati, A., & Niemand, D. (2022). Cultural heritage and risk assessments: Gaps, challenges, and future research directions for the inclusion of heritage within climate change adaptation and disaster management. Climate Resil Sustain., 1, e45. https://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.45
5. Council of the European Union (2014). Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on a Work Plan for Culture (2015–2018) (2014/C 463/02), Official Journal of the European Union, C 463/4. Retrieved from: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2014.463.01.0004.01.ENG#https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:
OJ.C_.2014.463.01.0004.01.ENG
6. Council of the European Union (2022). Council Resolution on the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023–2026 (2022/C 466/01). ST/15381/2022/INIT, OJ C 466, 7.12.2022, p. 1–18. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022G1207%2801%29&qid=1671635488811
7. Dauvrin, M. & Lorant, V. (2017). Cultural competence and social relationships: a social network analysis. International Nursing Review 64, 195–204.
8. European Commission (2014). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe, Brussels, 22.7.2014, COM(2014) 477 final. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2014:477:FIN.
9. European Commission (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A New European Agenda for Culture. COM/2018/267 final. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2018:267:FIN.
10. European Commission (2019). Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, European framework for action on cultural heritage, Publications Office, 2019. Retrieved from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/949707.
11. Gupta, M. & Gupta, S. (2019). Influence of National Cultures on Operations Management and Supply Chain Management Practices – A Research Agenda. Prod Oper Manag, 28: 2681–2698. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13100.
12. Heath, R.L., Johansen, W., Vujnovic, M. & Kruckeberg, D. (2018). Cultural Analysis. In The International Encyclopedia of Strategic Communication (eds R.L. Heath and W. Johansen). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119010722.iesc0058
13. Keitumetse, S.O. (2011). Sustainable development and cultural heritage management in Botswana: towards sustainable communities. Sust. Dev., 19: 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.419
14. Kim, S. & Lee, J. (2019). Citizen Participation, Process, and Transparency in Local Government: An Exploratory Study. Policy Stud J, 47: 1026–1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12236
15. Kiss, B., Sekulova, F., Hörschelmann, K., Salk, C. F., Takahashi, W., & Wamsler, C. (2022). Citizen participation in the governance of nature-based solutions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(3), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1987
16. Mannarini, T., Fedi, A. & Trippetti, S. (2010). Public involvement: How to encourage citizen participation. J. Community. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 20: 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1030
17. Nguyen, N.T.B. & Umemoto, K. (2009). Understanding leadership for cross-cultural knowledge management. J Ldrship Studies, 2: 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20078
18. Regulation (EU) 2019/880 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the introduction and the import of cultural goods. PE/82/2018/REV/1, OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 1–14. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/880/oj
19. Rode, J. C., Huang, X., & Flynn, B. (2016). A cross-cultural examination of the relationships among human resource management practices and organisational commitment: an institutional collectivism perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 26: 471–489. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12117.
20. Sacco, P.L. & Crociata, A. (2013). A strategic framework for cultural planning. Int J Urban Reg Res, 37: 1688–1706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01159.x
21. Tenhiälä, A., Giluk, T.L., Kepes, S., Simón, C., Oh, I.-S. & Kim, S. (2016). The Research-Practice Gap in Human Resource Management: A Cross-Cultural Study. Hum Resour Manage, 55: 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21656

Abstract views: 147
PDF Downloads: 124
Opublikowane
2024-03-04
Dział
JĘZYK, KULTURA, KOMUNIKACJA