INNOVATIVE METHODS OF TEACHING ENGLISH IN CYBER SOCIETY
Słowa kluczowe:
teaching methodology, innovation, technology, second language learning
Abstrakt
This paper discusses the innovative and interesting methods of teaching English. There are variety of teaching methods ranging from traditional to modern. Everyone has their own perspective and conclusions about teaching English as a foreign language. It is proved that whatever the teaching methodology, it must be centered on the learner as his mind is never static; it is constantly growing and changing. The practical part of this article aims to show the awareness of teachers regarding the innovative technologies and methodologies as well as to locate students’ reactions to the implementations of these methodologies.
Wykaz bibliografii
1. Babelyuk, O. (2017). Culture Strategy in Translating Postmodern Literary Text. Periodyk Naukowy Akademii Polonijnej w Częstochowie, 22(3). DOI: 10.23856/2202. [in English].
2. Babelyuk O., Koliasa O., Kushlyk O, Smaglii V. (2020). Using Distance EdTech for Remote Foreign Language Teaching During the COVID-19 Lockdown in Ukraine. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on the English Language in Ukrainian Context, November 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3735588 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3735588
3. Babelyuk, O., Koliasa, O., Lopushanskyy, V., Smaglii, V., Yukhymets,S. (2021). Psychological Difficulties during the Covid Lockdown: Video in Blended Digital Teaching Language, Literature, and Culture.Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Covid 19 Challenges (1) p. 172-182. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.13
4. Brown, H. (2001). Teaching by principles : an interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Longman. Brown, J. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning : a teacher's guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge England New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Carter, R and D. Nunan (2001). (Ed). Teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cohen, A. (2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow, England New York: Pearson/Longman.
6. Coyle, D. 2007. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Garrison, R. D. & Vaughan, N. D. (2007). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Gartner, A., Kohler, M. & Riessman, F. (1971). Children teach children; learning by teaching. New York: Harper & Row. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Essex, England: Longman.
8. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G. & Chinn, C.A. (2006). “Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006)”. Educational Psychologist. 42 (2), p. 99–107.
9. Huttner, J. (2012). Theory and practice in EFL teacher education: bridging the gap. Bristol, UK Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
10. Kamphorst, J.C., Hofman, W.H.A., Jansen, E.P.W.A. & Terlouw, C. (2013) The relationship between perceived competence and earned credits in competence based higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 38(6), 646-661.
11. Kasper, L. (2000). Content-based college ESL instruction. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and the way forward. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.
13. Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Malanuyk, M. (2019). Intersemiotic Translation as a Method of Teaching English to Mentally Handicapped Students. Periodyk Naukowy Akademii Polonijnej w Częstochowie, 35 (4). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23856/3511 [in English].
15. Markham, T., Larmer, J. & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project based learning handbook : a guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers. Novato, Calif: Buck Institute for Education. Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Boston, Mass: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
16. Richards, J.C. and T. Rodgers (2002). Approaches and methods in language Teaching: a description and analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. Ru, J., Font, A. & Cebrin, G. (2013) Towards high-quality reflective learning amongst law undergraduate students: analysing students’ reflective journals during a problem-based learning course, Quality in Higher Education, 19:2, p. 191-209.
17. Seliger, H. & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sharma, P. & Barrett, B. (2007). Blended learning : using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Oxford: Macmillan. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 2(1), 3-10.
18. Smith, M. & Trede, F. (2013) Reflective practice in the transition phase from university student to novice graduate: implications for teaching reflective practice. Higher Education Research & Development. 32(4), p. 632-645.
19. Son, J.-B. (2007). Learner experiences in Web-based language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 20(1), p. 21-36.
20. Stevick, E. W. (1990) Humanism in Language Learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tomlinson, C. (1999). The differentiated classroom: responding to the needs of all learners.
21. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Tosey, P. & Mathison, J., (2006) “Introducing Neuro-Linguistic Programming Centre for Management Learning & Development, School of Management, University of Surrey.
22. Widdowson, H. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Babelyuk O., Koliasa O., Kushlyk O, Smaglii V. (2020). Using Distance EdTech for Remote Foreign Language Teaching During the COVID-19 Lockdown in Ukraine. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on the English Language in Ukrainian Context, November 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3735588 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3735588
3. Babelyuk, O., Koliasa, O., Lopushanskyy, V., Smaglii, V., Yukhymets,S. (2021). Psychological Difficulties during the Covid Lockdown: Video in Blended Digital Teaching Language, Literature, and Culture.Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Covid 19 Challenges (1) p. 172-182. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.13
4. Brown, H. (2001). Teaching by principles : an interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Longman. Brown, J. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning : a teacher's guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge England New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Carter, R and D. Nunan (2001). (Ed). Teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cohen, A. (2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow, England New York: Pearson/Longman.
6. Coyle, D. 2007. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Garrison, R. D. & Vaughan, N. D. (2007). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Gartner, A., Kohler, M. & Riessman, F. (1971). Children teach children; learning by teaching. New York: Harper & Row. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Essex, England: Longman.
8. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G. & Chinn, C.A. (2006). “Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006)”. Educational Psychologist. 42 (2), p. 99–107.
9. Huttner, J. (2012). Theory and practice in EFL teacher education: bridging the gap. Bristol, UK Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
10. Kamphorst, J.C., Hofman, W.H.A., Jansen, E.P.W.A. & Terlouw, C. (2013) The relationship between perceived competence and earned credits in competence based higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 38(6), 646-661.
11. Kasper, L. (2000). Content-based college ESL instruction. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and the way forward. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.
13. Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Malanuyk, M. (2019). Intersemiotic Translation as a Method of Teaching English to Mentally Handicapped Students. Periodyk Naukowy Akademii Polonijnej w Częstochowie, 35 (4). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23856/3511 [in English].
15. Markham, T., Larmer, J. & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project based learning handbook : a guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers. Novato, Calif: Buck Institute for Education. Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Boston, Mass: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
16. Richards, J.C. and T. Rodgers (2002). Approaches and methods in language Teaching: a description and analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. Ru, J., Font, A. & Cebrin, G. (2013) Towards high-quality reflective learning amongst law undergraduate students: analysing students’ reflective journals during a problem-based learning course, Quality in Higher Education, 19:2, p. 191-209.
17. Seliger, H. & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sharma, P. & Barrett, B. (2007). Blended learning : using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Oxford: Macmillan. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 2(1), 3-10.
18. Smith, M. & Trede, F. (2013) Reflective practice in the transition phase from university student to novice graduate: implications for teaching reflective practice. Higher Education Research & Development. 32(4), p. 632-645.
19. Son, J.-B. (2007). Learner experiences in Web-based language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 20(1), p. 21-36.
20. Stevick, E. W. (1990) Humanism in Language Learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tomlinson, C. (1999). The differentiated classroom: responding to the needs of all learners.
21. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Tosey, P. & Mathison, J., (2006) “Introducing Neuro-Linguistic Programming Centre for Management Learning & Development, School of Management, University of Surrey.
22. Widdowson, H. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Abstract views: 290 PDF Downloads: 140
Opublikowane
2021-08-20
Jak cytować
Babelyuk, O., Malanyuk, M., Wiraszka, I., & Galaidin, A. (2021). INNOVATIVE METHODS OF TEACHING ENGLISH IN CYBER SOCIETY. Periodyk Naukowy Akademii Polonijnej, 44(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.23856/4402
Dział
JĘZYK, KULTURA, KOMUNIKACJA
