HOW HUMAN THINKING IS INFLUENCED BY THE SPOKEN LANGUAGE

Mariana Opyr; Nataliia Myronenko; Svitlana Panchyshyn; Yurii Kalistratov

doi:10.23856/6212

Mariana Opyr https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0233-7227
Nataliia Myronenko https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5463-6336
Svitlana Panchyshyn https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9444-4232
Yurii Kalistratov https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4873-2768

Keywords: thought, language, community, studies, human brain, distinction

Abstract

This paper aims to prove a deep connection between language and thought and confirm that language is a powerful tool that humans possess. It is not just a collection of words, but rather a medium of communication that has far-reaching impacts. Effective communication heavily relies on language, which serves as a vital tool for communicating with others. Although it may not determine our thought patterns, language is universally recognized as an essential component of human interaction. With over 7,000 languages spoken worldwide, each one boasts a unique vocabulary, sound, and structure. Humans possess an incredible ability to convey complex ideas and thoughts through language. Language can also impact our perception of time and color. Different languages have varying words to describe colors, with some having only a few, such as dark and light. This article explores these various aspects of language. The connection between language and thought is intricate and multi-dimensional. Language is an essential aspect of human interaction, and its structure is linked to brain processes and external factors in nature. This article intends to discuss the varying meanings of language expressions and their significance.

References

1. Boroditsky, L. & Gaby, A. (2010). Remembrances of Times East: Absolute Spatial Representations of Time in an Australian Aboriginal Community. Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/0956797610386621
2. Boroditsky, L. (2011). "How Languages Construct Time. In Dehaene and Brannon" (Eds.,) Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought. Elsevier. ISBN: 978-0-12-385948-8
3. Everett Daniel L. (2017). How Language Began: The Story of Humanity's Greatest Invention. Liveright. 352 p.
4. Fausey, C. & Boroditsky, L. (2011). "Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review: Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 150–157. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0021-5
5. Fausey, C. M., Long, B. L., Inamori, A. & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Constructing agency: The role of language. Frontiers In Cultural Psychology, 1, 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00162
6. Floyd, K. (2011). Communication matters. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
7. Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108 (3), 819–824. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007
8. Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306(5695), 496–499. doi:10.1126/science.1094492
9. Guiora, A.Z., Beit-Hallahmi, B., Fried, B., Yoder, C. (1982) Language environment and genderidentity attainment. Language Learning, 32 (2), 289–304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1982.tb00973.x
10. Leavitt, J. (2011). Linguistic Relativities: Language Diversity and Modern Thought, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
11. Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. (Eds.). (2006). Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. M., & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 8 (3), 108–114. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003
13. Oludamini Ogunnaike (2010). Language may help create, not just convey, thoughts and feelings. Harvard University. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101103111206.htm