THE MODERN TEACHER AS A SUBJECT IN THE PROCESS OF FORMING FUTURE PHD`S CULTURE OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: TEMPORA MUTANTUR, ET NOS MUTAMUR IN ILLIS

Anastasiia Kuzmenko

doi:10.23856/6304

Anastasiia Kuzmenko https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1189-1438

Keywords: academic staff, skills, values, ethical standards, higher education, post-graduate, research, pedagogy, education

Abstract

The article is aimed to characterize the skills and qualities of a modern university teacher in Ukrainian higher education as a subject in the process of forming the culture of academic integrity for the future Doctor of Philosophy. The instructor must showcase a profound grasp of the various scientific fields they teach, possessing the foundational knowledge to tackle diverse socio-economic, production, and cultural challenges. Furthermore, it is crucial for the instructor to remain abreast of new research, discoveries, and hypotheses, anticipating the evolving landscape of the science they teach and fostering a culture of scientific and pedagogical thought. Effective communication skills are essential for instructors, facilitating lucid and accessible explanations of intricate concepts and enhancing students’ comprehension of the material. The instructor’s capacity to stimulate the intellectual growth of PhD candidates, nurture creative and critical thinking, and employ innovative teaching methodologies delineates a high level of professionalism. An instructor should also be committed to encouraging the personal development of students, fostering their critical thinking, creative autonomy, and self-expression. All these efforts contribute to the cultivation of academic integrity among PhD candidates. In essence, these characteristics converge to transform the instructor into not just a conduit of knowledge but also a mentor who nurtures the scholarly potential of future PhDs.

References

1. Bakhmat, N., & Sydoruk, L. (2019). Formuvannia suchasnykh uiavlenn pro adaptatyvne osvitnie seredovyshche zakladu vyshchoi osvity [Formation of modern perceptions of the adaptive educational environment of higher education institution]. Osvitnii prostir Ukrainy. Rozdil: Istoriia pedahohiky, (№15), 17–25. [In Ukrainian]
2. Volkova, N. P., & Stepanova, A. A. (2018). Fasilitator yak vazhliva rolova pozitsiia suchasnogo vikladacha vyshu [Facilitator as an important role position of a modern university teacher]. Visnyk universytetu im. Alfreda Nobelia. Seriia "Pedahohika i psykholohiia". Pedahohichni nauky, 1(15), 228-234. [In Ukrainian]
3. Volobueva, O. F. (2014). Profesiina diialnist suchasnoho vikladacha vyshchoi shkoly: vyklyky ta priorytety [Professional activity of a modern higher education teacher: challenges and priorities]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykoronnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriia: Pedahohichni ta psykholohichni nauky, 4, 392–406. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/znpnapv_ppn_2014_4_36 c.401[In Ukrainian]
4. Humenyuk, O. G. (2008). Psykholoho-pedahohichna kultura yak sutnisna kharakterystyka profesiinoi diialnosti vykladacha vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu [Psychological and pedagogical culture as an essential characteristic of the professional activity of a higher education teacher]. Universitetski naukovi zapysky, 2, 406–410. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Unzap_2008_2_74. c. 407 [In Ukrainian]
5. Kozak, L. V. (2012). The structure and characteristics of innovative professional activities university teachers. Pedahohichnyi protses: teoriia ta praktyka, 2, 50–60. [In Ukrainian]
6. Krapivina, N., & Bondarenko, S. (2023). Vplyv imidzhu vykladacha na motyvatsiyu ta akademichnu uspishnist zdobuvachiv vyshchoyi osvity. [The Impact of the Instructor’s Image on the Motivation and Academic Success of Higher Education Students]. Perspectives and Innovations in Science, Series "Psychology,"16(34), 482–494. [In Ukrainian]
7. Luchaninova, O. P. (2023). Rol adaptivno-refleksiykhnix praktik v osvitnomu procesi zakladiv vischoyi osvity Ukrayiny u voyennyy chas. [The Role of Adaptive-Reflective Practices in the Educational Process of Higher Education Institutions in Ukraine During Wartime]. Imidzh Suchasnogo Pedagoga, (3(204)), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.33272/2522-9729-2022-3(204)-52-59 [In Ukrainian]
8. Mishchikha, L.P. (2019). Kreatyvnist yak vahomа kharakterystyka innovatsiynoyi diyalnosti vykladacha vishchoyi shkoly. [Creativity as a Significant Characteristic of the Innovative Activity of a Higher Education Teacher]. Psychology of Creativity, 12(26). Kyiv : Fenix Publishers. URL: http://lib.pnu.edu.ua:8080/handle/123456789/3303 [In Ukrainian]
9. Osvitno-naukova programma pidgotovki zdobuvachiv vyshchoyi osvity stupenya doktora filosofiyi. [Educational and Scientific Program for the Training of Higher Education Doctoral Candidates in Philosophy]. Odeskyy derzhavnyy ahrarnyy universytet. p. 22. URL: https://osau.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/PROEKT_ONP_VM_PhD_doktor-filosofiyi_2022.pdf [In Ukrainian].
10. Pekhota, O.M. (2013). Formuvannia tekhnolohichnoi kultury suchasnoho vykladacha universytetu. [Formation of technological culture in a modern university instructor]. Naukovyi visnyk MDU im. V.O. Sukhomlynskoho. Pedahohichni nauky, 1(31), 5–10. [In Ukrainian]
11. Proyekt osvitno-naukovoyi programy pidgotovky doktoriv filosofiyi "Pravo." [Educational and Scientific Program for the Training of Philosophy Doctors "Law." ] Dnipropetrovskyy derzhavnyy universytet vnutrishnikh sprav. Dnipro. p. 11 URL: https://dduvs.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/files/Structure/science/doctorate/2021/pon1.pdf [In Ukrainian]
12. Strelnikov, V. (2013). Komponenty profesiynoyi kompetentnosti vykladacha vyshchoyi shkoly. [Components of professional competence of a higher education instructor]. Humanitarnyy visnyk. Seriya. Pedahohika, No. 28, 278–285. URL: file:///C:/Users/anast/Downloads/gvpdpu_2013_28_1_55.pdf [In Ukrainian]