CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE COMMERCIAL SPHERE BY THE ENGLISH-LANGUAGE FRAME TRADE
Abstract
The article examines the features of the component structure and internal relationships in the English-language framework TRADE. According to M. Minsky, we understand the frame as a structure that represents stereotyped knowledge and expectations that allow the system to ensure internal consistency. In linguistics, this manifests itself in the fact that the meaning of a single word requires access to all the basic knowledge associated with that word. For example, understanding the word sell requires knowledge of the commercial transfer situation, which includes the seller, buyer, goods, money, and their relationships. In this sense, it is the perspective that is important: from the buyer’s point of view, the trading process is a purchase, while from the seller’s point of view, it is a sale. The article analyzes the possibilities of applying different perspectives to reveal the internal structure of the TRADE frame and the relational arcs between its components. The formation of the frame occurs due to the combination of propositions that determine the relationship between its components. A proposition as a basic structure of knowledge representation has a logical subject (the target concept) and a logical predicate (a feature attributed to the subject). The construction of propositions within the frame is carried out through the functioning of the basic propositional frames, which enable the coherence of its cognitive content.
References
2. Apple. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/.
3. Barsalou, L. (1992). Frames, concepts and conceptual fields. In A. Lehrer, E. Kittay (eds). Frames, Fields and Contrasts, 21–74.
4. Bruder. Retrieved from https://bruderx.com/.
5. Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/.
6. Cienki, A. (2010). 'Frames, Idealized Cognitive Models, and Domains'. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0007.
7. English – Corpora (EC). Retrieved from https://www.english-corpora.org/.
8. Fillmore, Ch. (1968). The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88.
9. Fillmore, Ch. (1977). Case for case reopened. Syntax and semantics. Grammatical relations, 76–138.
10. Fillmore, Ch. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.). Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–37.
11. Harvard Business Online School. Retrieved from https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/steps-of-negotiation.
12. How to Negotiate: The 5 Stages of the Negotiation Process. Retrieved from https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-negotiate.
13. Khan Academy. Retrieved from https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/ap-macroeconomics/basic-economics-concepts-macro/scarcity-and-growth/a/lesson-summary-comparative-advantage-and-gains-from-trade.
14. Khomenska, I. (2014). Formuvannia osnovnykh sehmentiv terminosystemy kohnityvnoi linhvistyky (diakhronichnyi ta synkhronichnyi aspekty) [Formation of the main segments of the term system of cognitive linguistics (diachronic and synchronic aspects)]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohii, 791, 169–174. [in Ukrainian]
15. Libre Texts. Social Sciences. Retrieved from https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/ Economics/Principles_of_Macroeconomics_3e_%28OpenStax%29/20%3A_International_ Trade/20.02%3A_Absolute_and_Comparative_Advantage.
16. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. Retrieved from https://www.ldoceonline.com.
17. Manakin, V. M. (2016). Universalni smysly movy ta noosfera [Universal meanings of language and the noosphere]. Odeskyi linhvistychnyi visnyk, 7, 231–235. [in Ukrainian]
18. Minsky, M. (1988). The society of mind. New York : Simon & Schuster.
19. Minsky, M. A. (1975). Framework for Representing Knowledge. In P. H. Winston (ed.). The Psychology of Computer Vision, 211–277.
20. Novosadska, O. B. (2018). The concept of Frame and the Framing Process Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, VI (43), 38–41. Retrieved from ernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/518817.pdf.
21. Oxford Learner’s Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com.
22. Praveen Kumar Soni. A step-by-step guide to successful supplier negotiations. Retrieved from https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/successful-supplier-negotiations-column/642884/.
23. Preston R. The 6 Stages of the Process of Negotiation (With Tips). Retrieved from https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/process-of-negotiation.
24. Samsung. Retrieved from https://www.samsung.com/ua/.
25. Scragg, G. (1976). Semantic nets as memory models. In E. Charniak & Y. Wilks. Computational Semantics, 101–127.
26. Sketch Engine. Retrieved from https://www.sketchengine.eu/.
27. The Best Way to Do Market Research for a New Product Development. Retrieved from https://predikdata.com/the-best-way-to-do-market-research-for-a-new-product-development/.
28. Tom’s guide. Retrieved from https://forums.tomsguide.com/threads/whats-your-best-advice-when-shopping-for-a-laptop.465692/#post-1928939.
29. Tyler, S. A. (1978). The said and the unsaid: mind, meaning, and culture. New York: Academic Press.
30. Types of galaxy devices. Retrieved from https://www.techtarget.com/searchmobilecomputing/definition/Samsung-Galaxy.
31. Useful Expressions For Negotiating In English. Retrieved from https://oxfordhousebcn.com/en/useful-expressions-for-negotiating-in-english/.
32. Veremchuk, E. O. (2023). Obiektyvatsiia etychnykh katehorii v anhliiskii movi: linhvokohnityvni ta synerhetychhi parametry [Objectification of ethical categories in the English language: linguistic-cognitive and synergistic parameters]. Zaporizhzhia: Zaporizkyi natsionalnyi universytet. [in Ukrainian]
33. What are the different series of Samsung phones? Retrieved from https://www.samsung.com/uk/mobile-phone-buying-guide/samsung-phone-ranges-explained/.
34. Zhabotynska, S. A. (2020). The active learner’s construction-combinatory thesaurues: user-driven principles of compiling (a cognitive linguistic approach). Cognition, communication, discourse, 93–107.
35. Zhabotynska, S. A. (1997). Kohnityvna linhvistyka: pryntsypy kontekstualnoho modeliuvannia [Cognitive linguistics: principles of contextual modeling]. Linhvistychni studii, 2, 3–11. [in Ukrainian]
Abstract views: 94 PDF Downloads: 55