"FORCE MAJEURE" AS A BASIS FOR EXEMPTION FROM CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY IN EUROPEAN UNION LEGISLATION
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the legislative regulation of the "force majeure" category as a basis for exemption from contractual liability in the countries of the European Union. The legislative norms of such countries as Italy, France, Germany were developed and analyzed; conclusions were made regarding the peculiarities of the regulation of the "force majeure" category in contractual relations; the issue of the autonomy of the parties to the contract in the identification of such circumstances is studied. Considerable attention is paid to the relevant judicial practice, the decisions of the Courts of Cassation regarding their interpretation of "force majeure circumstances" and the characteristics by which the circumstances can be classified as force majeure. It has been established that the exemption of a party to a contractual relationship from civil liability is possible, according to the legislation of most countries, provided that the circumstances that have arisen meet two characteristics: emergency and unpredictability, that is, only external events that cannot be predicted and controlled. The author emphasizes variability circumstances that may fall under the features of "force majeure" and, accordingly, be basis for exemption from contractual liability. The role of the courts in regulating the contractual relations of the parties in the event of force majeure and the scope of their powers regarding the possibility of regulating contractual legal relations are investigated.
References
2. "Cass. 19 October 2006, n. 22396" (2006). Italy. Supreme Court of Cassation. Case No. 22396. October 19, 2006. Retrieved from https://www.studiolegalestefanelli.it/Media/Sentenze/Relazione_Tematica_Civile_056-2020.pdf [in Italian].
3. "Cass. February 5, 2016, n. 2316" (2016). Italy. Supreme Court of Cassation. Case No.965. February, 2016. Retrieved from https://i2.res.24o.it/pdf2010/Editrice/ILSOLE24ORE/QUOTIDIANO_EDILIZIA/Online/_Oggetti_Correlati/Documenti/2020/05/26/CASSAZ_CIVILE_7463.pdf?uuid=d23bbc68-9e83-11ea-a866-97e2792f15c4 .[in Italian].
4. Civil Code (16 March 1942, n. 262). Approval of the text of the Civil Code. (042U0262) (GU General Series n.79 of 04-04-1942) – Retrieved from https://www.gazzetta ufficio.it/dettaglio/codici/codice Civile. [in Italian].
5. Court of Cassation, Plenary Assembly, of April 14, 2006, 04-18.902, Published in the bulletin. France, April, 2006. Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000007051642/[in French].
6. German Civil Code BGB. Germany, Civil Code in the version promulgated on 2 January 2002 (Federal Law Gazette [Bundesgesetzblatt] I page 42, 2909; 2003 I page 738), last amended by Article 1 of the Act of 10 August 2021 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 3515). Retrieved from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisc h_bgb.html
7. Glaser P., Pinto L., Taylor Wessing. (2020). French law: force majeure and revision for unforeseen circumstances—principles to the test of COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.taylorwessing.com/en/insightsand-
events/insights/2020/04/french-law-force-majeure-and-revision-for-unforeseen-circumstances-principles-to-the-test-of-covid19?form=MG0 AV3.
8. Fazilatfar, H. (2012). The impact of supervening illegality on international contracts in a comparative context. The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 45(2), 158-188. Retrieved from https://unisapressjournals.co.za/index.php/CILSA/ article/view/11377.
9. French Civil Code. (2016). (Cartwright J., Fauvarque-Cosson B., Whittaker S., Trans). Retrieved from https://www.trans-lex.org/601101/_/french-civil-code-2016/.
10. Prof. Dr. Agim Nuhiu (2020). Exemption of civil dilectual responsibility. ECONOMICUS, No.19, issue 1/ 2020, 70-79. Retrieved from https://uet.edu.al/economicus/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/economicus-19-issue-1.pdf.
11. René David (1946). Frustration of Contract in French Law Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law. Cambridge University Press Vol. 28, No. 3/4., 1946, 11-14 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/754645.
Abstract views: 11 PDF Downloads: 8