SYMBOL AND LEGAL MYTH

Oleh Borodenko

doi:10.23856/6802

Oleh Borodenko Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8835-7471

Keywords: philosophy of law, legal myth, legal consciousness, symbol, symbolization, symbolic field, symbolic reduction

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to prove the hypothesis: symbol plays a decisive role in the process of legal myth-making; it occupies a central place in the structure of the legal myth. Nowadays, the role of the symbol in the structure of legal myth has not been sufficiently studied in Ukrainian and foreign science, which explains the relevance of our research. Symbol and legal myth have much in common, for example: sociocultural characteristics; timelessness; the ability to combine opposites. Every legal myth is a combination of legal reality and the unreal. Legal myths and mythologemes are rooted in the collective consciousness, but they also manifest subconscious intentions. Based on the analysis of some legal myths common in modern Ukraine and the world (myths about the omnipotence of the state and law; myth about the inevitability of punishment; myth about the inviolability of legal norms), it is shown how the set of key symbols (symbolic field) forms the primary structure of the myth. Thanks to symbolic reduction in the process of myth-making, the main thing is separated from the secondary. The evolution of the legal myth in time and space consolidates and develops "eternal" mythologemes and "eternal" mythical plots. Methods used in the study: general scientific (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction); methods of theoretical research (from abstract to concrete), historical method, philosophical methodology (phenomenological method, dialectical method, anthropological approach).

References

1. Cassirer, E. (1955). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume 1: Language / trans. Ralph Manheim. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
2. Cassirer, E. (1955). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume 2: Myth / trans. Ralph Manheim. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
3. Ceglarska, А. (2021). Law as a Fable: The Issue of Myth in the Interpretation of Law. In: Studia Iuridica Lublinensia. Vol. XXX, 2, Р. 49–61.
4. Colman, W. (2011). Symbolic objects and the analytic frame. In: Journal of Analytical Psychology, 56(2), р. 184–202.
5. Fitzpatrick, P. (1992). The Mythology of Modern Law. Sociology of Law and Crime. London: Routledge. 235 p.
6. Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological Types. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
7. Jung, C. G. (2009). The Red Book (Liber Novus). Ed. S. Shamdasani. NewYork&London: W.W. Norton.
8. Jung, C. G. аnd others (1964). Man and his Symbols. Doubleday: Anchor Press. 320 p.
9. Langer, S. (1942). Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art.Сambridge, Massachussets: Harvard University Press.
10. Olawale, E. Т. (1961). La nature du droit coutumier africain. Paris: Présence Africaine. 325 p.
11. Rouland, N. (1988). Anthropologie juridique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
12. Shumka, M. L. (2001). Symvolizm u filosofskii kulturi Ukrainy. [Symbolism in the philosophical culture of Ukraine]. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Philosophical Sciences in the specialty 09.00.05 – History of Philosophy. Lviv: Ivan Franko State University of Lviv. P. 3 [in Ukrainian].
13. Tarasov, M. (2012). Yurydychna nauka ta naukova ratsionalnist (do pytannia pro filosofsko-metodolohichne samovyznachennia yurysprudentsii) [Legal science and scientific rationality (on the issue of philosophical and methodological self-determination of jurisprudence)] // Filosofiia prava ta zahalna teoriia prava. № 1. P. 68–76 [in Ukrainian].
14. Tishchenko, Yu. V. (2006). Kontseptualnyi pidkhid do vyznachennia pravovoho mifu [A conceptual approach to defining a legal myth] // Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava: zb. nauk. prats. Odesa: Yurydychna literatura. Issue 29. P. 29–34 [in Ukrainian].
15. Tishchenko, Yu. V. (2020). Pravovyi mif u strukturi pravovoi realnosti [Legal myth in the structure of legal reality]. Yurydychnyi visnyk. №2. P. 17–24 [in Ukrainian].
16. Whitehead, A. (1927). Symbolism, Its Meaning and Effect. New York: Macmillan Co. 119 p.