THE ROLE OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN SHAPING  ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOR

Liudmyla Prisniakova; Iryna Agapova

doi:10.23856/7029

Liudmyla Prisniakova Dnipro Humanities University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2127-1830
Iryna Agapova Dnipro Humanities University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3558-7564

Keywords: empathy, self-regulation, sustainability, emotional competence, environmental values

Abstract

Emotional Intelligence (EI) is a multifaceted concept encompassing the ability to process emotional information for effective interaction and the formation of environmentally responsible behavior. This article summarizes theoretical approaches to the conceptualization of EI in the context of environmental responsibility through the analysis of three key models.The Ability Model by Mayer and Salovey defines EI as a set of cognitive skills involving the perception, utilization, understanding, and management of emotions, which facilitates well-grounded environmental decisions, such as assessing the impact of environmental degradation.The Mixed Model by Bar-On integrates emotional and social competencies, such as empathy and adaptability, which motivate sustainable lifestyles, including the reduction of resource consumption. Petrides’ Trait Model emphasizes subjective emotional self-perceptions, shaping emotional connectedness with nature and encouraging pro-environmental initiatives.Each model offers a unique perspective on EI, underscoring its role in shaping environmental awareness through cognitive, social, and subjective mechanisms. The practical application of these models involves the development of educational programs aimed at fostering EI to support ecological practices such as waste recycling and the advocacy of green policies. For instance, Bar-On’s model contributes to the formation of sustainability-oriented communities through collective action, while the Trait Model enhances individual motivation for eco-activism. These approaches establish a foundation for integrating EI into policymaking that promotes sustainable development. Further research should aim to integrate these models to strengthen their influence on sustainable practices across diverse cultural and social contexts.

References

1. Bamberg, S. et al. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour Journal of Environmental Psychology 27(1), 14–25.
2. Bar-On, R. (1997). Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Technical Manual Multi- Health Systems.
3. Batson, C. D. et al. Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(1), 105–118 (1997).
4. Clayton, S. et al. (2009). Conservation Psychology: Understanding and Promoting Human Care for Nature Wiley-Blackwell.
5. Day, S. et al. (2001). Adaptive governance for a changing coastline: Science, policy and publics in search of a sustainable future Adapting to Climate Change, 368–383.
6. Dietz, T. (2010. Narrowing the US energy efficiency gap Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(37), 16007–16008.
7. Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction American Psychologist 66(4), 290–302.
8. Goleman, D. (2005). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ Bantam Books.
9. Goleman, D. (2011). Primal Leadership: Realizing the Power of Emotional Intelligence More Than Sound
10. Kaiser, F. G. (2003). et al. Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge Applied Psychology: An International Review 52(4), 598–613.
11. Kitayama, S. et al. (2000). The pursuit of happiness and the realization of sympathy: Cultural patterns of self, social relations, and well-being Culture and Subjective Well-Being, 113–161.
12. Kollmuss, А. et al. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8(3), 239–260 13. Krasny, M. E. et al. (2012). Civic ecology: A pathway for Earth Stewardship in cities Frontiers in Ecology and The Environment 10(5), 267–273.
14. Markowitz, E. M. et al. (2012). Climate change and moral judgment Nature Climate Change 2(4), 243–247.
15. Mayer, J. D. et al. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Implications for Educators, 3–31.
16. Metcalf, L. et al. (2013). Leadership for sustainability: An evolution of leadership ability Journal of Business Ethics 112(3), 369–384.
17. Moser, S. C. et al. (2011). Communicating climate change: Closing the science-action gap The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, 161–174.
18. Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people Environmental Education Research 18(5), 625–642.
19. Osbaldiston, R. et al. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments Environment and Behavior 44(2), 257–299.
20. Petrides, K. V. et al. (2001). Trait emotional intelligence: Psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies European Journal of Personality 15(6), 425–448.
21. Pfattheicher, S. et al. (2016). Feelings for the suffering of others and the environment: Compassion fosters proenvironmental tendencies Environment and Behavior 48(7), 929–945.
22. Pretty, J. et al. (2004). Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management Conservation Biology 18(3), 631–638.
23. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review Biological Conservation 141(10), 2417–2431.
24. Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(4), 327–339.
25. Stevenson, R. B. et al. (2013) International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education American Educational Research Association and Routledge.
26. Weber, E. U. (2016). What shapes perceptions of climate change? WIREs Climate Change 7(1), 125–134.