THE FEITORIA PRIME MARKET MODEL: A CASE STUDY OF BILATERAL TRADE OPPORTUNITIES PORTUGAL - POLAND
Keywords:
Feitoria Prime Market Model, Comparative Advantages, Index of Complementarity (IC), Index of Effectiveness Commerce (EC).
Abstract
The paper aims to present the strategic management model for economic development, the Feitoria Prime Market Model (FPM). The FPM identifies new markets and new products for enterprises to export their products. FPM is based in the comparative advantage concept of Ricardo (1817) and incorporates economic and political dimensions in order to avoid unstable economies. The study present a particular case, Portugal-Poland, that has the objective to find bilateral trade opportunities. The methodology presented below is configured confronting the potential trade to effectively verified among the countries and uses a trade database 2012-16 period from the UN COMTRADE free database.
References
Bryson, J. & Edwards, L. (2017). Strategic Planning in the Public Sector. Oxford Research publication. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.128. [in English].
Galvão. (2000). O Nordeste e as negociações multilaterais de comércio: do GATT à OMC. Fortaleza: BNB. 177p. [in Portugal].
Myrdal, G. (1956). An international economy. New York: Harper and Row Publishers. [in English].
Prebisch, R. (1959). Commercial Policy in Underdeveloped Countries. American Economic Review, Proceedings, Vol. 49, 251-273. [in English].
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London: John Murray. [in English].
Steiner, G. (1979). Strategic Planning. What every manager must know. USA. New York: Free press paperbacks. [in English].
Vaillant, M. & Ons, A. (2003). Winners and losers in a free trade area between the United States and MERCOSUR. (2017). Working Papers, No. 1403, 44. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://decon.edu.uy/publica/2003/Doc1403.pdf. [in English].
Xavier, L. F. (2009). Comércio potencial versus comércio efetivo: uma análise do aproveitamento das relações entre o Nordeste brasileiro e a União Europeia. (Dissertation. Master in Economics). Recife: PIMES/UFPE. [in Portugal].
Xavier, L. F., Carvalho, R. G., Tenorio Junior, A. J. A., Sousa, E. S., Costa, E. C. (2008). Aproveitamento das relações entre Pernambuco e Portugal: uma análise do comércio potencial versus comércio efetivo. Anais do Fórum BNB de Desenvolvimento e XIII Encontro de Economia Regional. Fortaleza: ANPEC/BNB. [in Portugal].
Galvão. (2000). O Nordeste e as negociações multilaterais de comércio: do GATT à OMC. Fortaleza: BNB. 177p. [in Portugal].
Myrdal, G. (1956). An international economy. New York: Harper and Row Publishers. [in English].
Prebisch, R. (1959). Commercial Policy in Underdeveloped Countries. American Economic Review, Proceedings, Vol. 49, 251-273. [in English].
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London: John Murray. [in English].
Steiner, G. (1979). Strategic Planning. What every manager must know. USA. New York: Free press paperbacks. [in English].
Vaillant, M. & Ons, A. (2003). Winners and losers in a free trade area between the United States and MERCOSUR. (2017). Working Papers, No. 1403, 44. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://decon.edu.uy/publica/2003/Doc1403.pdf. [in English].
Xavier, L. F. (2009). Comércio potencial versus comércio efetivo: uma análise do aproveitamento das relações entre o Nordeste brasileiro e a União Europeia. (Dissertation. Master in Economics). Recife: PIMES/UFPE. [in Portugal].
Xavier, L. F., Carvalho, R. G., Tenorio Junior, A. J. A., Sousa, E. S., Costa, E. C. (2008). Aproveitamento das relações entre Pernambuco e Portugal: uma análise do comércio potencial versus comércio efetivo. Anais do Fórum BNB de Desenvolvimento e XIII Encontro de Economia Regional. Fortaleza: ANPEC/BNB. [in Portugal].
Abstract views: 697 PDF Downloads: 220
Published
2018-04-06
How to Cite
Botelho, J. M. M., & Kulishov, V. (2018). THE FEITORIA PRIME MARKET MODEL: A CASE STUDY OF BILATERAL TRADE OPPORTUNITIES PORTUGAL - POLAND. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 27(2), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.23856/2701
Section
Social Sciences
