• Nataliya Avdymyrets Melitopol Bohdan Khmelnytsky State Pedagogical University
Keywords: multicomponent structure, student youth, communicative competence


It was found that the end result of professional training of student youth is communicative competence. Communicative-dialogic competence acts as a hierarchically organized mental formation, as a certain level of development of the individual, which involves the formation of its holistic system of motivational, personal qualities and functional-operational manifestations that implement emotional, cognitive and behavioral components of personality. The most important problem of modern science of the last decades, which is obliged to form persistent guidance and meanings of realization of diverse cultural interests and values in students, is the problem of substantiation of communicative-dialogic competence, the choice of ways of full-fledged, comprehensive, harmonious improvement of students and their lives. The position of “communication” is basic because it defines a wide range of communicative and informational interactions of personality in the process of educational and professional activity. Thus, the development of various forms of communicative competence of a modern person, the conceptual content of which we define as a systemic algorithmis actualized. The main component of the algorithm is the communicative potential, which contains the communicative talent of the personality and the knowledge necessary for the realization of communication. It is concluded that the communicative competence of student youth is a very important component of a broad and complex problem – the formation of its professionally significant qualities. Philosophical support for the development of communicative and dialogical competence of student youth in the cultural and educational space primarily involves the dialectic of communication, and in this competence decisively encourages the individual to choose the socio-cultural communicative sphere where his subjective qualities will be demanded and realized.


1. Abramova I. T. (2000). Vozrastnaya psihologiya. [Age psychology.] – Moscow: Moscow Psychological and Social Institute. [in Russian]
2. Abstractof dissertation: Konovalenko T. V. (2006). Rozvytok vyrazno-komunikatyvnykh navychok maibutnikh uchytyliv. [Development of expressive-communicative skills of future teachers]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian]
3. Andreeva G. M. (2006). Sotsialna psikhologia: ucheb. Posobie dlia studentov VUZov. [Social psychology: handbook for college students] – Moscow: Aspect Press. [in Russian]
4. Artemchuk O. G. (2010). Rozvytok tvorchodo potentsialu maibutnikh praktychnykh psykholodiv. [Development of creative potential of future practical psychologists] – Kyiv: Lybid. [in Ukrainian]
5. Istratova O. N. (2005). Psikhodiagnostika: kollektsia luchshykh testov: Psikhologicheski praktikum. [Psychodiagnostics: a collection of the best tests: Psychological Practice] – Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix. [in Russian]
6. Klymenko V. A. (2005). Metodychnyi analiz poniattia “psykhychnyi rozvytok kiudyny”. [Methodological analysis of the concept of “human mental development”]. Retrieved from [in Ukrainian]
7. Karelina A. A. (2003). Psikhologicheskie testy (Tom 1). [Psychological tests (Vols 1)] – Mоskow: Gumanit. ed. center VLADOS. (in Russian)
8. Mishchuk I. M. (2007) Skladovi komunikatuvnoi kompetentsii (Tekst) // Novi tekhnologii navchannia [Vyp. 46]. [Components of communicative competence (Text) // New learning technologies [Ed. 46]. – Kyiv: Publishing House of the Institute of Innovative Technologies and Educational Content. (in Ukrainian)
9. Taranenko I. M. (1996). Kompetentnisty – vumoga suchasnosti. [Competence – the requirement of modernityю] Kiev: Svitlo: № 1. (in Ukrainian)
10. Troitska O. M. (2016). Dialog i tolerantnisty u kulturno-osvitnyomu prostori vyshchoi shkoly (Monografia). [Dialogue and tolerance in the cultural and educational space of higher school (Monograph)] – Melitopol: Ed. of B. Khmelnitsky MDPU. (in Ukrainian)
11. Formanovskaya N. I. (2009). Rechevoi yetiket i kultura obshcheniia. [Speech etiquette and culture of communication] – St. Petersburg: Piter. (in Russian)
12. L. Ron Hubbard (2004). Dianetika – sovremennaia nauka o razume. [Dianetics – contemporary science about mind] – Moscow: New-era (in Russian)

Abstract views: 86
PDF Downloads: 125
How to Cite
Avdymyrets, N. (2021). PHILOSOPHY OF COMMUNICATIVE SPACE, AS A COMPLEX MULTICOMPONENT STRUCTURE. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 40(3), 178-191.