INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL CONTEXT OF IRREDENTISM
Abstract
The article deals with the role of irredentism in international politics. The author relies on the approach of T. Ambrosio, who proposes to take into account the international or regional context in the study of irredentism. Systematic and historical methods were used in the research. Irredentism is seen as a set of strategies and actions of the mother state and the national minority, which aim is to unite a divided ethnic community in one political body. Irredentism is a form of the political process, the implementation of which involves the use of several technologies. Modern irredentism can exist in “mild” and “hard” forms. The “mild” form implies the strengthening of the political, economic, and cultural influence of the mother state on kin groups, while the “hard” form involves the annexation of the territory. The origin of irredentism and its transformation conform to the changes in the system of international relations. The hypothesis that the role of the international community in the regulation of irredentist conflicts in the process of international relations development has been proved. The author analyses the current state of irredentism in Europe in the context of integration processes, and it is determined that the conditions for the accession to the EU and NATO restrain the manifestations of irredentism. The example of the Russian irredentist project reveals that the international legal framework does not clearly regulate the forms of countering irredentism.
References
Brubaker, R. (2000). Nationalism reframed. Nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. London: Cambridge university press [in English].
European Council in Copenhagen 21-22 june 1993. Conclusions of the Presidency (1993). Brussels. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21225/72921.pdf. [in English].
Fuzesi, J. C. Е. (2006). Explaining irredentism: the case of Hungary and its transborder minorities in Romania and Slovakia: A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in Government. London School of Economics and Political Science: University of London. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/2935. [in English].
Gellner, E. (1992). Prishestvie nacionalizma. Mify nacii i klassa [The Coming of Nationalism and its Interpretation: The Myths of Nation and Class]. Put: mezhdunarodnyj filosofskij zhurnal. No 1. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://izbornik.org.ua/gellner/puti.htm. [in Russian].
Gokcek, G. (2010). Irredentism versus Secessionism: The Potential for International Conflict. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1595095. [in English].
Haidai, S. V. (2017). Doslidzhennia suspilno-politychnoho protsesu: osoblyvosti, skladnosti ta ukrainskyi kontekst [The study of the socio-political process: features, complexities and Ukrainian context]. Naukovi pratsi MAUP. Vyp. 52(1). [in Ukrainian].
Horowitz, D. L. (1991). Irredentas and Secessions: Adjacent Phenomena, Neglected Connections (Chapter 1). Irredentism and International Politics / N. Chazan (ed.). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publ. [in English].
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 March 2014 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/68/L.39 and Add.1)] 68/262. Territorial integrity of Ukraine. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/68/262. [in English].
Semchenkov, A. S., Barash, R. E. (2009). Problema razdelennyh narodov v kontekste transformacii mirovogo politicheskogo prostranstva [Problem of the divided nations in a context of transformation of world political space]. Politicheskaya nauka. No 1. [in Russian].
Solovev, A. I. (2009). Politologiya: Politicheskaya teoriya, politicheskie tehnologii [Political Science: Political Theory, Political Technologies]. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Moskva: Aspekt Press, 2009. [in Russian].
The Alliance’s New Strategic Concept agreed by the Heads of State and Government participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council, 7-8 Nov. 1991. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/uk/natohq/official_texts_23847.htm?selectedLocale=uk. [in English].
Ukraina ta proekt “russkoho myra”: analit. dop. (2014) [Ukraine and the “Russian World” project: analytical reports]. S. I. Zdioruk, V. M. Yablonskyi, V. V. Tokman [ta in.]; za red. V. M. Yablonskoho ta S. I. Zdioruka. Kyiv: NISD. (Ser. «Humanitarnyi rozvytok», vyp. 1). [in Ukrainian].
Ushakov, S. V. (2009). Organy mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya i problemy etnicheskogo nacionalizma [International justice bodies and problems of ethnical nationalism]. Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava: Nauchno-teoreticheskij i informacionno-prakticheskij zhurnal. No 2(74) aprel-iyun. [in Russian].
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action Adopted by the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna on 25 June 1993. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/vienna.aspx. [in English].
Vinogradov, V. N. (1993). Ob istoricheskih kornyah «goryachih tochek» na Balkanah [On the historical roots of flashpoint areas in the Balkans]. Novaya i novejshaya istoriya. No 4. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://vivovoco.astronet.ru/VV/PAPERS/HISTORY/BALKANS. HTM. [in Russian].
Waterbury, M. A. (2013). From Irredentism to Diaspora Politics: States and Transborder Ethnic Groups in Eastern Europe. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://cgs.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/g mtp_wp_6.pdf. [in English].
Zhumadilov, A. (2014). Reintehratsiia Krymu: metodolohichni aspekty [Reintegration of Crimea: methodological aspects]. Natsionalna bezpeka i oborona. No 5-6. [in Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 217 PDF Downloads: 239