COGNITIVE AND LINGUISTIC MECHANISMS OF CONCEPTUAL INTEGRATION OF SACREDNESS

Keywords: categorization, cognition, concept, pragmatics, communication, mentality, reference, semantic change

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the cognitive peculiarities of the concept of Sacredness and the means of expressing the chosen concept in the novel of James Joyce “The Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man”. Much attention has been paid to specific cognitive factors that account for the formation of occasion-bound meanings for effective communication and cooperation. The topicality of the paper coincides with studying and understanding the process of categorization and conceptualization of the world and with the analysis of textual communication. We should try to figure out what roles texts may fulfil, how they might be encoded or decoded, what people are using them for in a given set of occurrence, and so forth. The words and sentences on the page are reliable clues in accessing the entity of the concept of Sacredness. The methods of the research are as follows: the inductive-deductive method of analysis of language material; the method of the semantic modelling and contextual interpretational analysis; the method of the quantitative counting of received language empirical data. The Novelty of the paper is associated with increased interest in cognitive linguistics and cognitive semantics; the interaction of thought and language, with an attempt to understand how our speech is made, perceived, understood and interpreted.

References

1. Aarts, B., McMahon, A (2006). The Handbook of English Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
2. Arutyunova, N. D. (1990). Referentsiya. Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [Reference. Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary]. Moskva: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. S. 411–412. [in Russian]
3. Campbell, L., Mixco, M. J. (2007). A Glossary of Historical Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
4. Deik, T.A. van. (1989). Yazyk. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Cognition Communication]. Moskva: Progress. [in Russian]
5. Evans, V., Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
6. Gábor, G. (2002). Semantic change and cognition. Cognitive Linguistics 13-2. P. 123–166.
7. Geeraets, D. (2007). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Joyce, J. (1996). A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. London: Penguin Popular Classics.
9. Keller, R. (1994). On Language Change. London: Routledge.
10. Kononenko, V. I. (2004). Kontsept i hudozhnij tekst [Concept and the literary text]. Kyiv–Ivano- Frankivsk. [in Ukrainian]
11. Kubrjakova, E. S. (1995). Evoljucija lingvisticheskih idej vo vtoroj polovine 20 veka. (Opyt paradigmal’nogo analiza. Jazyk i nauka konca 20 veka: sb. statej Pod red. akad. Ju.S. Stepanova. Moskva: Institut jazykoznanija RAN. S. 144–238. [in Russian]
12. Longman dictionary of contemporary English. (1992). Harlow: Longman.
13. McMahon, A. (2000). Change, Chance, and Optimality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Raimo, A. (1989). Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Abstract views: 87
PDF Downloads: 88
Published
2021-08-20
How to Cite
Matkovska, M. (2021). COGNITIVE AND LINGUISTIC MECHANISMS OF CONCEPTUAL INTEGRATION OF SACREDNESS. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 44(1), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.23856/4410
Section
LANGUAGE, CULTURE, COMMUNICATION