THE HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE AND RELEVANT FOREIGN AUTHORITIES IN THE PROCESS OF APPOINTING JUDGES
Abstract
The article is devoted to defining the role and place of the High Council of Justice and relevant foreign agencies amidst forming the judiciary. In Ukraine, considerable attention is paid to determining the status of the High Council of Justice. This is because fundamentals of the judiciary’s independence in terms of its formation and functioning, which directly relate judicial selection, their appointment, and dismissal, are laid with consideration to international instruments and specific foreign experience. The European community proposes to introduce into the legal framework a model of the judiciary’s organization through establishing appropriate bodies endowed with institutional and operational independence towards other branches of government. In addition, a determining tool for ensuring the independence of the High Council of Justice and the relevant judicial councils in foreign countries is the statutory consolidation of their legal status: either in the constitution or in the specific law. Ukraine has embarked on the path of strengthening the High Council of Justice as a body having constitutional status in the post-Soviet period. This period is characterized by a legal arrangement of institutional principles of judicial power and the legal status of its holders, consolidation of guarantees of their independence, and the autonomy of judges.
References
2. Holovatyy S. (1996) Konstytutsiyi novykh derzhav Yevropy ta Aziyi [Constitutions of the new states of Europe and Asia]. Kyiv: Ukr. Pravn. Fundatsiya. Vyd-vo «Pravo». [in Ukrainian].
3. Kostkina YU.O. (2016) Vzayemodiya vyshchoyi rady pravosuddya z orhanamy derzhavnoyi vlady, orhanamy suddivsʹkoho samovryaduvannya ta inshymy subʺyektamy prava [Interaction of the High Council of Justice with public authorities, judicial self-government bodies and other subjects of law]. Visnyk kryminalʹnoho sudochynstva, 4, 139-146. [in Ukrainian].
4. Les conseils de la justice en Europe. URL: https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/ccje/textes/CSMFrance-TR10_fr.pdf.
5. Okunʹkov L.A. (2001) Konstytutsyy hosudarstv Evropy [Constitutions of European states]. Moscow: Norma. [in Russian].
6. Rehlament Vyshchoyi rady pravosuddya [Rules of Procedure of the High Council of Justice]. (2017, January. 24). URL: http://www.vru.gov.ua/legislative_acts/28. [in Ukrainian].
7. Rekomendatsiya CM/Rec (2010) 12 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shchodo suddiv: nezalezhnistʹ, efektyvnistʹ ta obovʺyazky, ukhvaleno Komitetom Ministriv Rady Yevropy 17 lystopada 2010 r. na 1098 zasidanni zastupnykiv ministriv [Recommendation CM / Rec (2010) 12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities, adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 17 November 2010 at the 1098th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies]. (2010). URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_a38. [in Ukrainian].
8. Report on Independence and Accountability of the Judiciary, adopted e General Assembly of the ENCJ Rome 13 June 2014. URL: https://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/workinggroups/independence/encj_report_independence_accountability_adopted_version_ sept_2014.pdf.
9. Solov'yov A.A. (2016) Nezavisimost' sudeyskogo korpusa (opyt yevropeyskikh gosudarstv) [Independence of the judiciary (experience of European states)]. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta, 5, 133-140. [in Russian].
10. Sukharev A.YA. (2003) Pravovye systemy stran myra: Éntsyklopedycheskyy spravochnyk [Legal Systems of the World: An Encyclopedic Reference]. Moscow: Norma. [in Russian].
Abstract views: 321 PDF Downloads: 206
