BLACK HOLE OF CAPTIVITY IN THE UNIVERSE OF WAR

Keywords: POW (prisoner of war), vaccination against captivity, uncertainty, stress, emotional death, additional trauma, starvation, behavior regulation, symbolic mimicry, illusion

Abstract

The article examines the psychological features of military servants in captivity. The methodological basis of the research is indicated. The article includes an analysis of the works of experts in various fields of knowledge. Scientific works since the Great Northern War of 1700-1721 until the ongoing Joint Forces Operation in eastern Ukraine were reviewed. We have proved that POW’s (prisoner of war) rationalization of conduct is positive because it greatly contributes to the survival in captivity. The expediency of resorting to mimicry for the captured military servants is substantiated. We considered the models of POWs’ behavioral mimicry and gave concrete examples. It is determined that the creation of a multifaceted illusion on them (their thoughts, reasoning, and attitude) is the basic condition for successful mimicry of POWs.

We defined the dependence of the duration of the POW’s process of adaptation to new conditions on the individual cognitive interest of a particular serviceman, as a natural desire to get information about the environment and understand the laws of its functioning. It is identified that the process of the POW’s adaptation involves a review of their values of life. The necessity of vaccination against captivity is theoretically substantiated and proved.

We proved that rehabilitation measures are mandatory for all persons released from captivity. The results of the research allow forming a holistic view of the effectiveness of POWs’ behavior regulation using symbolic mimicry, the importance, and the expediency of further research.

References

1. Antonov A. V. (1984). Znak. Znachennia. Smysl. Psykholohichne doslidzhennia. [Sign. Significance. Smisl. Psychological dosage]. Kyiv: “Znannia”. (in Ukrainian).
2. Asieiev S. (2020). Svitlyi shliakh” Istoriia odnoho kontstaboru [Bright Way. The story of a concentration camp]. Lviv: Korotka proza. “Staroho Leva”. (in Ukrainian).
3. Cherevychnyi S.V. (2019). Pryiniattia rishennia komandyrom u sytuatsii nevyznachenosti ta ambivalentnoho vplyvu. [The commander took the decision from the situation of unimportance and ambivalent injection]. Kyiv: Instytut psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka, “Aktualni problemy psykholohii”. (in Ukrainian).
4. Dvinger Edvin E. (2004). Armiya za kolyuchej provolokoj. Dnevnik nemeckogo voennoplennogo v Rossii 1915-1918 gg. [An army behind barbed wire. Diary of a German prisoner of war in Russia 1915-1918]. Moscow: ZAO “Centrpoligraf”. (in Germany).
5. Frankl V. (2018). Liudyna v poshukakh spravzhnoho sensu. Psykholoh u kontstabori. [Man in search of true meaning. Psychologist in a concentration camp]. Kharkiv: “Hlobus”. (in Austria). Hlukhovskyi V.S. (2008). Moi spohady [My memories]. Kyiv: “Osnova”. (in Ukrainian).
6. Illiushchenko S.Iu. (2020). Psykholohichnyi zmist fenomena refleksii yak vlastyvosti, protsesu, stanu. [Psychological content of the phenomenon of reflection as a property, process, state.]. Kyiv: Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu oborony Ukrainy”. (in Ukrainian).
7. Khmiliar O.F. (2017). Psykholohiia povedinky viiskovosluzhbovtsia v poloni. Zastosuvannia Sukhoputnykh viisk Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy u konfliktakh suchasnosti: zbirnyk tez dopovidei naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii [Application of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in modern conflicts]. Lviv: NASV. (in Ukrainian).
7. Khmiliar O.F. (2016). Psykholohiia symvolichnoi rehuliatsii dii i vchynkiv osobystosti. [Psychology of symbolic regulation of actions and deeds of the individual] Monograph. Kyiv: “Kontekst Ukraina”. (in Ukrainian).
8. Leontev D.A. (1992). Zhiznennyy mir cheloveka i problema potrebnostey [Human life and the problem of needs]. Psikhol. zhurn. (in USSR).
9. Osodlo V.I. (2013). Osobystisni chynnyky podolannia stresovykh sytuatsii v osoblyvykh umovakh. [Personal factors of overcoming stressful situations in special conditions]. Problemy ekstremalnoi ta kryzovoi psykholohii. Kyiv: University of Civil Defense of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian).
10. Pavlychenko D. (2014). Tsina svobody [The price of freedom]. Kyiv: “Sammit-Knyha”. (in Ukrainian).
11. Pobidash A.Iu. (2012). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti osnovnykh faz piratskoho polonu [Psychological features of the main phases of pirate captivity]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. (in Ukrainian).
12. Savintsev V. (2012). Viiskova psykholohiia ta pedahohika: innovatsiinyi pidkhid [Military psychology and pedagogy: an innovative approach]. Kyiv: NUOU. (in Ukrainian).
13. Shalamov Varlam. (2013). Kolymskie rasskazy. [Kolyma stories]. Moscow: Azbuka-Klassika. (in USSR).
14. Shyrobokov Yu. (2019). Do pytannia pro sotsialno-psykholohichnu model naslidkiv polonu [On the question of the socio-psychological model of the consequences of captivity]. Uman: Psykholohichnyi zhurnal Umanskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Pavla Tychyny. (in Ukrainian).
15. Shyrobokov Yu. (2020). Teoretychni ta prykladni aspekty psykholohii viiskovoho polonu. [Theoretical and applied aspects of the psychology of military captivity]. Monograph. Kharkiv: “V Spravi”. (in Ukrainian).
16. Ulianov K. (2020). Bronovanyi rozum. Boiovyi stres ta psykholohiia ekstremalnykh sytuatsii. [Armored mind. Combat stress and psychology of extreme situations]. Kyiv: “UkrSICh”. (in Ukrainian).
17. Uspenskij A. (2015). Na vojne. V plenu. Vospominaniya. [At war. In captivity. Memories.]. SPb.: “Izdatelstvo K. Tublina”. (in Russia).
18. Zaretska N. (2020). Ne resurs, a aktyv: zvilneni z polonu znaiut te, choho ne znaiut inshi. [Not a resource, but an asset: freed from captivity know what others do not know]. [Elektronnyi Resurs] Rezhym dostupu.: https://novynarnia.com/2020/01/28/ne-resurs-a-aktiv-zvilneni-z-polonu- znayut-te-chogo-ne-znayut-inshi/ (in Ukrainian).
19. Zaretska N. (2019). Intehrovana model reintehratsii ta postizoliatsiinoho suprovodu v publichnomu upravlinni vidnovlenniam osib, zvilnenykh z izoliatsii [Integrated model of reintegration and post-isolation support in public management of rehabilitation of persons released from isolation]. Kyiv: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy. (in Ukrainian).
20. Zimbardo Filip. Efekt Liutsyfera. (2019). Chomu khoroshi liudy chyniat zlo. [The Lucifer effect. Why good people do evil]. Kyiv: Yakaboo Publishing. (in USA).
21. Zhinky Tsentralnoi ta Skhidnoi Yevropy u Druhii svitovii viini: henderna spetsyfika dosvidu v chasy ekstremalnoho nasylstva (2015). [Women of Central and Eastern Europe in the World War II: Gender Specifics of Experience in Times of Extreme Violence]: zb. nauk. prats / za nauk. red. dokt. istor. nauk H. Hrinchenko. Kyiv: “TOV ART KNYHA”. (in Ukrainian).
22. Ti, shcho perezhyly peklo: svidchennia zhertv pro mistsia nezakonnykh uviaznen na Donbasi. (2015). [Those who survived hell: testimonies of victims about places of illegal imprisonment in Donbass] Koalitsiia hromadskykh orhanizatsii ta initsiatyv “Spravedlyvist zarady myru na Donbasi”. Kyiv: “TsP Komprynt”. (in Ukrainian).

Abstract views: 109
PDF Downloads: 113
Published
2021-08-20
How to Cite
Apalkov, V. (2021). BLACK HOLE OF CAPTIVITY IN THE UNIVERSE OF WAR. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 44(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.23856/4401
Section
LANGUAGE, CULTURE, COMMUNICATION