FEATURES OF REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTION IN WOMEN WITH MISCARRIAGES
Abstract
The aim of the study was to analyse the reproductive function of women with miscarriages among the population of Lviv region. The data of the results of medical and genetic counseling of 120 women with miscarriages who visited the medical and genetic center and the “Institute of Hereditary Pathology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine” were analyzed. The obtained indicators were compared with similar parameters of the control group: 80 healthy women who asked for family planning consultation. A group of women with miscarriage was formed to study the features of menstrual function, somatic, reproductive and gynecological history in comparison with similar indicators in healthy women. It was found that the majority of women (47 (39.2%) with miscarriages were aged 31–15 years and 74 (61.6%) of women by social status were employees. 52 (48.0%) women of the main group had the onset of menarche significantly later – after 15 years old, in 25 (20.8%) of them the duration of the menstrual cycle was 28–85 days and in 11 (9.1%) – 35–55 days (p < 0.05). Women with miscarriages were significantly more likely to have a complicated somatic history and these are 86 (71.7%), mainly due to pathology of the cardiovascular system – 27 (22.5%), against 43 (53.75%) and 9 (11, 2%) (p <0.05), respectively. All of them 120 (100.0%) had significantly more frequent complications of reproductive and gynecological history due to miscarriages and stillbirths. In the control group this figure was 11 (13.7%) and 19 (23.8%) respectively (p<0.05).
References
2. Andreeva MV, Lavenyukova EM, Matinyan GK. (2014). Social’nyj, somaticheskij i akushersko-ginekologicheskij status zhenshchin s nerazvivayushchejsya beremennost’yu, zhitel’nic krupnogo promyshlennogo goroda [Social, somatic and obstetric-gynecological status of women with underdeveloped pregnancy, residents of a large industrial city]. Al’manah. Volgograd. 308–810 [in Russian]
3. De Krom G, Arens YH, Coonen E, Van Ravenswaaij-Arts CM, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Evers JL, Van Golde RJ, De Die-Smulders CE.(2015). Recurrent miscarriage in translocation carriers: no differences in clinical characteristics between couples who accept and couples who decline PGD. Hum Reprod. 30(2):484–4. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu314.
4. Dobrohotova YUE, Gankovskaya LV, Bahareva IV, Svitich OA, Malushenko SV, Magomedova AM. (2016). Rol’ immunnyh mekhanizmov v patogeneze nevynashivaniya beremennosti [The role of immune mechanisms in the pathogenesis of non-leaving pregnancy]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 7: 5–10. [in Russian]
5. Garrido-Gimenez C, Alijotas-Reig J.(2015). Recurrent miscarriage: causes, evaluation and management. Postgrad. Med. J. 91(1073):151–162. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014–432672.
6. Kamіns’kij VV, Konoplyanko VV, SHal’ko MN, Ratushnyak NYA.(2018). Suchasnі pіdhodi v lіkuvannі nevinoshuvannya vagіtnostі. Репродуктивное здоровье[Modern approaches in the treatment of non-pregnancy]. Reproduktyvnoe zdorove. 8, 1: 24–43. [in Ukrainian]
7. Kutteh WH. (2015). Novel strategies for the management of recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 33(3):161–1. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035–5552586.
8. Lisova KM, Kalinovska IV, Pryimak SH, Tokar PY, Varlas VN. (2021). Changes in the level of fetoplacental complex hormones in pregnant women with miscarriage. J Med Life.14(4):487–791. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2021–1089.
9. Mishchenko VP, Likhachev VK, Rudenko IV. (2016). Preventive maintenance of obstetricsgynecologic complications from positions etiopatogenetic approaches. Australian Journal of Education and Science. 1(17); 9: 575–582.
10. Rasmark Roepke E, Christiansen OB, Hansson SR (2019). Reliability of recurrent pregnancy loss diagnosis coding in the Swedish National Patient Register: a validation study. Clin Epidemiol. 8;11:375–581. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S199206. eCollection 2019.
11. Roumandeh N, Zare A, Saremi A.(2018). Immunology of Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. SJMR. 3 (2) :121–126. URL: http://saremjrm.com/article-1–16-en.html.
1. 12. SHCHerbina MO, Lіpko OP, SHCHerbina ІM, Mercalova OV, Potapova LV.(2019). Novі pіdhodi do profіlaktiki nespriyatlivih perinatal’nih naslіdkіv u zhіnok іz nevinoshuvannyam vagіtnostі [New approaches to prevention of unfavorable perinatal consequences in women with non-pregnancy]. Aktual’nі pitannya pedіatrії, akusherstva ta gіnekologії. 1:156–659. http://repo.knmu.edu.ua › bitstream › [in Ukrainian]
13. Torchinov AM, Cahilova SG, Begizova AM, Poluhova EV, Iolkina ME. (2017). Etiologicheskie faktory privychnogo nevynashivaniya beremennosti[The etiological factors of the usual non-obscuration of pregnancy]. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 16; 6:59–93. [in Russian]
14. Veropotvelyan PN. (2017). Reproduktivnoe zdorov’e zhenshchiny – odna iz vazhnejshih problem gosudarstva [The reproductive health of women is one of the most important problems of the state. Medical aspects of women’s health]. Medicinskie aspekty zdorov’ya zhenshchiny. 3:34–46. [in Ukrainian]
15. Vorobiova II, Zhyvetska-Denysova AA, Tkachenko VB, Rudakova NV, Tolkach SM. (2017). Nevynoshuvannia vahitnosti: suchasni pohliady na problemu (Ohliad literatury).HEALTH OF WOMAN. 3(119):113–117. [in Ukrainian]. https://med-expert.com.ua/journals/ua/nevinoshuvannja-vagitnosti-sucha.
16. Vovk IB, Kondratiuk VK, Trokhymovych OV, Kovalenko AI. (2012). Zahroza pereryvannia vahitnosti v ranni terminy: suchasni po hliady na etiolohiiu, patohenez, diahno styku ta likuvannia [The threat of pregnancy interruption in the early term: modern views on etiology, pathogenesis, a diode and treatment]. Zdorov’e zhenshchiny. 5:50–56. [in Ukrainian]
Abstract views: 161 PDF Downloads: 113
