ESSENTIAL AND TEMPORAL DIMENSIONS OF THE MATERIAL LEGAL RELATIONSHIP
Abstract
The paper provides a general description of the relationship regulated by law as a condition of movement and a way of concretizing relations in society. The thesis is defended, according to which a significant role belongs to the legal relationship and in the concretization of the duration of the social relations regulated by it. The content of civil relations in the regulatory state is studied in detail. It is established that the subjective right, which belongs to its holder, must correspond to the specific obligation of the obligated person. It is proved that the content of the possible behavior of the right holder is manifested both through domination over the debtor by demanding certain of his behavior, and through the own active behavior of the commissioner. As a result, legal relationships create specific social opportunities for legal entities to meet certain needs, either through their own actions or those of others. This is confirmed by the analysis of temporal factors inherent in the subjective substantive law of the individual. Proper regulation in this area is to ensure that the authorized person has a real opportunity to exercise his subjective right within an adequate and appropriate period. If the duration of the subjective right is not explicitly stated, reasonableness criteria should be used to calculate the duration or exercise of a particular subjective right. The interrelation of the subjective substantive law of its bearer with the legal obligation of the obligated person is the main purpose and role of the legal relationship. Subjective law must be exercised during the time during which it exists. Exercising outside the law is not an abuse (because the law no longer exists), but a habitual civil offense.
References
2. Azimov Ch.N. (1999). Poniattia tsyvilnykh pravovidnosyn. [The concept of civil relationship]. Visnyk universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. 1999. 6, 18-22. [In Ukrainian]. 3. Bodnar T.V. (2004). Strok (termin) vykonannia dohovirnoho zoboviazannia v tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy. [Term of fulfillment of the contractual obligation in the civil law of Ukraine]. Visnyk hospodarskoho sudochynstva. 2, 207-212. [In Ukrainian].
4. Bierling E.R. (1883). Zur Kritik der juristischen Gnindbegriffe. Gotha, Toil II. [In German].
5. Bratus S.N. (1947). Yurydycheskye lytsa v sovetskom hrazhdanskom prave. [Legal entities in Soviet civil law]. Uchenye trudy VYIuN Mynysterstva yustytsyy SSSR. 1947, XII, 10-33. [In Russian].
6. Bratus S.N. (1967). O predelakh osushchestvlenyia hrazhdanskykh prav. [On the limits of the exercise of civil rights]. Pravovedenye. 3, 79-86. [In Russian].
7. Guyvan P.D. (2014). Teoretychni pytannia strokiv u pryvatnomu pravi: monohrafiia. [Theoretical questions of terms in private law: monograph]. Kharkiv, Pravo, [In Ukrainian].
8. Guyvan P.D. (2015). Pravovaia pryroda hrazhdansko-pravovykh srokov. [The legal nature of civil law terms]. LEGEA SI VIATA. 6/2 (282), 26-30. [In Russian].
9. Hrybanov V.P. (1992). Predely osushchestvlenyia y zashchity hrazhdanskykh prav. [Limits of realization and protection of civil rights]. Moscow: Ros. Pravo, [In Russian].
10. Krasavchykov O.A. (1974). Dalneishaia kodyfykatsyia sovetskoho hrazhdanskoho zakonodatelstva. [Further codification of Soviet civil law]. Hrazhdanskoe pravo y sposoby ego zashchyty. Sbornyk uchenykh trudov. Vip.33 Sverdlovsk, 5-14. [In Russian].
11. Luts V.V. (2003). Stroky i terminy i novomu Tsyvilnomu kodeksi Ukrainy. [Terms and conditions and the new Civil Code of Ukraine]. Yurydychna Ukraina. 11, 3-8. [In Ukrainian].
12. Luts V.V. (2013). Stroky i terminy u tsyvilnomu pravi: monohrafiia. [Terms in civil law: monograph]. Kiev: Yurinkom Inter, [In Ukrainian].
13. Michurin Ye.O. (2006). Do pryrody obmezhen mainovykh prav fizychnykh osib. [On the nature of restrictions on property rights of individuals]. Forum prava, 3, 81-86. [In Ukrainian].
14. Rabinovych P.M. (1999). Osnovy zahalnoi teorii prava ta derzhavy. [Fundamentals of the general theory of law and the state]. Kiev: Atika, [In Ukrainian].
15. Romashchenko I. (2014). Poniattia tsyvilnoho pravovidnoshennia ta yoho struktura. [The concept of civil law and its structure]. Yurydychnyi zhurnal . 2/3, 59-63. [In Ukrainian].
16. Saithalina Zh.R. (1999). Pryroda subiektyvnoho tsyvilnoho prava. [The nature of subjective civil law]. Visnyk universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Kharkiv, 31 [In Ukrainian].
17. Savyny F.K. (2011). Systema sovremennoho rymskoho prava. [The system of modern Roman law]. T. I/ Per. s nem. H. Zhyhulyna; Pod red. O. Kutateladze, V. Zubaria. Moscow: Statut, [In Russian].
18. Shershenevych H.F. (1912). Obshchaia teoryia prava. [General theory of law]. Vip. III. Moscow: Izdanye Br. Bashmakovikh, [In Russian].
19. Shevchenko Ya.M. (2003). Tsyvilne pravo Ukrainy: Akademichnyi kurs. [Civil Law of Ukraine: Academic Course]. Pidruchnyk: U 2-kh tomakh / Za zah. red. Ya.M.Shevchenko – T. 1. Zahalna chastyna. Kiev:Vydavnychyi Dim «In Yure», [In Ukrainian].
20. Shyshka R.B. (ed.) (2005). Tsyvilne pravo Ukrainy. [Civil law of Ukraine]. Kurs lektsii. U 6-ty tomakh. T.V. Kn. 1. Zahalni polozhennia zoboviazalnoho prava. /Za red.. R.B.Shyshky. – Kharkiv: Espada, [In Ukrainian].
21. Slypchenko S.A., Smotrov O.Y., Kroitor V.A. (2006). Hrazhdanskoe y semeinoe parvo. [Civil and family law]. Yzd. 2-e, ysprav. y dopoln. Uchebnoe posobye. Kharkov: Espada, [In Russian].
22. Speranskyi M.M. (2001). Osnovanyia rossyiskoho prava. [Fundamentals of Russian law]. Pravovedenye. 4, 231-243. [In Russian].
23. Tobota Yu.A. (2013). Realizatsiia pryntsypu spravedlyvosti, dobrosovisnosti i rozumnosti u tsyvilnykh pravovidnosynakh. [Implementation of the principle of justice, good faith and reasonableness in civil law relations]. Visnyk hospodarskoho sudochynstva. 4, 147-151. [In Ukrainian].
24. Venherov A.B. (2000). Teoryia hosudarstva y prava. [Theory of State and Law]. Uchebnyk dlia yurydycheskykh vuzov. 3-e yzd. Moscow: Yurysprudentsyia, [In Russian].
25. Vieweg K., Werner W. (2010). Sachenrecht. 4. Auflage. Jena, [In German].
26. Volkov V.A. (2010). Zloupotreblenyia hrazhdanskymy pravamy. Problemы teoryy y praktyky: monohrafyia. [Abuses of civil rights. Problems of theory and practice: monograph]. Moscow: Volters Kluver, [In Russian].
27. Westermann H. P., Gursky K. H., Eickmann D. (2011). Sachenrecht. Heidelberg, [In German].
28. Yoffe O.S. (1949). Pravootnoshenye po sovetskomu hrazhdanskomu pravu. [Legal relationship under Soviet civil law]. Leningrad: Yzd-vo LHU, [In Russian].
29. Yoffe O.S. (2000). Hrazhdanskoe pravo. Izbrannye trudy. [Civil law. Selected works]. Moscow: Statut, [In Russian].
Abstract views: 108 PDF Downloads: 80
