LANGUAGE MEANS OF EXPRESSING IMPLICIT EVALUATION IN CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL DISCOURSE: PRAGMATIC ASPECT
Abstract
This article deals with role of politics and politicians in modern world, the linguistic tendencies of study of contemporary political discourse and the category of evaluation in general, and language means of expressing implicit evaluation in particular, which is considered to be a semantic and pragmatic category and one of the most powerful means of influence on the audience. The pragmatic aim of contemporary political discourse texts lays in the interpretation of event, conveying a variety of indirect or direct, supportive or opposing evaluating attitudes toward it. This study focuses on different evaluative language means used by politicians in their political speeches on different occasions within the appraisal theory framework, under which in this paper we understand a variety of meaning-making language means used by the speakers to express their evaluative involvement in communication.
References
2. Conley, T. M., Ward, J. O., & Bitzer, L. F. (1981). The classical tradition in rhetoric: Three views of George A. Kennedy’s synthesis. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 67(2), 206–215.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638109383566
3. Fowler, H. W., & Fowler, F. G. (2002). The King’s English. Oxford University Press.
4. Gawronski, B. (2001). Implicational schemata and correspondence bias: The role of implicit theories in situational adjustment. Pabst Science.
5. Higgins, R. L., & Snyder, C. R. (1990). Self-Handicapping from A Heiderian Perspective. In Self-Handicapping (pp. 239–273). Springer US.
6. Hofstede, G. H., & Hofstede, G. J. (2004). Cultures and organizations: Software for the mind (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Professional.
7. Jamieson, K. H., & Campbell, K. K. (2001). The interplay of influence: News, advertising, politics and the mass media (5th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
8. Karasik, V. I. (2004). Yazykovoi krug: lichnost, koncepty, diskurs [Language circle: individuum, concepts, discourse]. Moscow: Gnoziz.
9. Kozlova, O. B., & Pryhodko, А. M. (2021). The strategy of prevention of conflict in the English-language discourse of mediation. “Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University”, Series: “Philology. Journalism,” 3, 154–158. https://doi.org/10.32838/2710-4656/2021.3-1/26
10. Kyseliuk, N., & Pryhodko, V. (2019). Implementation of the ambivalent potential of lexical units in opposite communicative situations (based on English-language art
discourse). International Humanitarian University Herald. Philology, 2(43), 117–120. https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2019.43.2.30
11. Martin, J., & White, P. R. R. (2007).The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English (2005th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
12. Martin, J.R. in press. 'Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English', in Evaluattion in Text, Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (eds), Oxford, UK, OUP.
13. Maslow, A. H. (1976). Religions, Values and Peak-Experiences. Penguin Books.
14. Opeibi, O. B. (2011). Discourse strategies in political campaigns in Nigeria. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
15. Sinclair, A. (2004). An anatomy of terror: A history of terrorism. Pan Books.
16. Stuckey, M. E. (1989). Getting into the game: The pre-presidential rhetoric of Ronald Reagan. Praeger.
17. Swanson, D. L., Nimmo, D., Foote, J. S., Combs, J. E., Simmons, R. E., & Stuckey, M. E. (1990). Political Communication. Communication Booknotes, 21(5), 122–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10948009009488054
18. Thompson, J. A. (1987). Reformers and war: American progressive publicists and the first world war. Cambridge University Press.
19. Windt, T. (1990). Presidents and protesters: Political rhetoric in the 1960s. University of Alabama Press.
Abstract views: 263 PDF Downloads: 151
