UPDATE OF THE LEGAL STATUS OF CAPTIVE SERVICEMEN OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Abstract
The scientific article is devoted to the analysis of the criminal-executive and international humanitarian-legal nature of the special legal status of prisoners of war originating from a country with the status of a state-sponsor of terrorism, the ruling elite of which is granted the status of a terrorist in the international order, conducted on the basis of a scientific understanding of the conventional legal framework. Theoretical constructions and proposals for the potential future adoption of norms of international law regarding the difference in the legal status of prisoners of war countries, whose ruling regime is recognized as terrorist, and which themselves are state-sponsors of terrorism, are formulated. It is noted that the current international norms apply a universal approach to determining the legal status of prisoners of war, and without reference to individual possible legal statuses of states. Therefore, the current norms establish the same legal status for prisoners of war, including those of the state whose ruling regime is recognized as terrorist, and the country itself is a state sponsor of terrorism. It is emphasized that international humanitarian law is actually endowed with a compromise character between the principles of humanity and military necessity. It is substantiated that prisoners of war – representatives of the armed forces and other armed formations of the Russian Federation, as countries with the status of state-sponsors of terrorism, whose ruling regime is internationally recognized as terrorist, should receive a specific legal status aimed at deterring the continuation or escalation on the part of the terrorist country. The conditions and limitations of the legal status of this category of prisoners of war have been formulated, which should form a special legal status of prisoners of war. Based on the scientific systematization of the facts, it is noted that the UN is obviously experiencing a multi-year and systemic crisis, turning into a stage for verbal demarches. It is noted that in such a discredited status, the UN is unable to update the international humanitarian legal framework and is subject to critical reform.
References
2. Convention respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land 1907. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/assets/treaties/195-IHL-19-EN.pdf (2023, April, 25)
3. Convention respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land 1907. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/hague-conv-v-1907?activeTab=default (2023, April, 25)
4. Convention relating to certain Restrictions with regard to the Exercise of the Right of Capture in Naval War 1907. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/hague-conv-xi-1907?activeTab=default (2023, April, 25)
5. Convention concerning the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers in Naval War 1907. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/hague-conv-xiii-1907 . (2023, April, 25)
6. Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field 1949 (United Nations). Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gci-1949 (2023, April, 25)
7. Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea 1949 (United Nations). Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gcii-1949 (2023, April, 25)
8. Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War 1949 (United Nations). Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciii-1949 . (2023, April, 25)
9. Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War 1949 (United Nations). Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949 (2023, April, 25)
10. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 august 1949 and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) 1949 (United Nations). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/protocol-additional-geneva-conventions-12-august-1949-and (2023, April, 25)
11. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) 1949 (United Nations). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/protocol-additional-geneva-conventions-12-august-1949-and-0 (2023, April, 25)
12. Pyvovarov, V. V., & Sirets, O. O. (2023). Aktualizatsiya pravovoho statusu polonenykh boyovykiv PVK “Vagnera” [Update of legal status of prisoners of war militants of “Vagner” PMC]. Krym – tse Ukrayina: strategiya deokupatsiyi ta reintegratsiyi: Zbirnyk materialiv Mizhnarodnogo naukovo-praktychnoho krugloho stolu z nagody Dnia sprotyvu okupatsiyi Avtonomnoyi Respubliky Krym ta mista Sevastopolia [Crimea is Ukraine: strategy of deoccupation and reintegration: Collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Round Table on the occasion of the Day of Resistance to the Occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea
and the City of Sevastopol]. Odesa: “Yurydyka”, 185–189 (in Ukr.).
13. Status “derzhavy-terorysta”: shcho za nym sliduie i chy dozvolyt prytiahnuty rosiiu za vchyneni neiu zlochyny? [The status of a "terrorist state": what follows it and will it allow russia to be prosecuted for its crimes?]. Retrieved from https://www.helsinki.org.ua/articles/status-derzhavy-terorysta-shcho-za-nym-sliduie-i-chy-dozvolyt-prytiahnuty-rosiiu-za-vchyneni-neiu-zlochyny/ [in Ukrainian]. (2023, April, 29).
14. Korotkyi, T. R. (Ed.). (2017). Mizhnarodne humanitarne pravo. Posibnyk dlia yurysta [International humanitarian law. A guide for a lawyer]. Kyiv-Odesa: Ukrainian Helsinki Union for Human Rights, Phoenix.
15. Orlovska, N., Dermenzhy, M. (2023). Boiovyi imunitet yak kryminalno-pravova novella ta yoho znachennia u zapobihanni viiskovii zlochynnosti [Combat immunity as a criminal law novel and its importance in the prevention of war crimes]. Omul, criminologia, ştiinţa, 2(1), 394–397
Abstract views: 118 PDF Downloads: 87
