WHAT DO WOMEN SPEAK ABOUT: NARRATIVES OF FEMALE CHARACTERS IN MAINSTREAM CINEMA

Keywords: narrative analysis, archetype, psycholinguistic image, top box office films, qualitative analysis, gender linguistics, social linguistics.

Abstract

The paper focuses on the language of female characters in the top thirty box office films with a leading female character (1999–2023). The research applies the narrative analysis to the turns of heroines to account for their archetypal representation. The paper proposes a view on female archetypal characters popular with large audiences around the globe and presents a typology of widely recognizable female narratives. The received framework reflects the contemporary vision of the female image and role in society. The study employs Jung’s idea of the archetype as a repetitive image of the collective unconscious. Each archetype is governed by several constant motivations and needs, defining the characters’ (verbal) behavior. Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs serves as the basis for the delineation of archetypes. The moral valence of each character depends upon the satisfaction of her aspirations. Recognized and met wants predetermine the protagonist/heroic archetypes, while thwarted needs bring about antagonist/villainous archetypes. The research is based on Schmidt’s typology of forty-five master characters. Among the overwhelming majority of traditional images of the Nurturer and Matriarch archetypes, there appear the representatives of the Female Messiah, Father’s Daughter, and Amazon, respectively, pursuing the goals of improving society and finding self-identity and independence.

References

1. Al-Mahadin, S. (2013). Is Christian a Sadist? Fifty Shades of Grey in Popular Imagination. Feminist Media Studies, 13(3), P. 566–570. doi:10.1080/14680777.2013.786271
2. Bassil-Morozow, H. (2018). Feminist Film Criticism: Towards a Jungian Approach. In The Routledge International Handbook of Jungian Film Studies. Ed. Luke Hockley. London and New York: Routledge. P. 115–127.
3. Berezhna, M. V. (2022). Female Psycholinguistic Archetypes in Mass Culture Films (Based on the Characters’ Hierarchy of Needs). Filolohiya pochatku ХХІ storichchya: tradytsiyi ta novatorstvo: materialy Mizhnarodnoyi naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi [Philology of the beginning of the 21st century: traditions and innovation: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Lviv – Torun: Liha-Pres. P. 46–48. doi:10.36059/978-966-397- 263–3/10
4. Cowden, T.D., LaFever, C., & Viders, S. (2013). The Complete Writer’s Guide to Heroes & Heroines: Sixteen Master Archetypes. Pasadena, CA: Archetype Press. 214 p.
5. Creed, B. (2007). The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism, and Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge, 200 p.
6. Curtis, N. (2020). Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel: The (Dis)continuity of Gender Politics. Journal of Popular Culture, 53(4), P. 926–945. doi:10.1111/jpcu.12942
7. Duncan, L. E., and Peterson, B. E. (2010). Gender and Motivation for Achievement, Affiliation- Intimacy, and Power. In J. C. Chrisler and D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology, Vol. 2. Gender Research in Social and Applied Psychology. P. 41–62. New York, NY: Springer.
8. Faber, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. (2009). Resonance to Archetypes in Media: There's Some Accounting for Taste. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3). P. 307–322. doi:10.1016/ j.jrp.2008.11.003
9. Han, Y. (2019). Jungian Character Network in Growing Other Character Archetypes in Films. International Journal of Contents, 15(2), Jun. P. 13–19.
10. Hefner, V., Firchau, R.-J., Norton, K., & Shevel, G. (2017). Happily Ever After? A Content Analysis of Romantic Ideals in Disney Princess Films. Communication Studies, 68(5), P. 511–532. doi:10.1080/10510974.2017.1365092
11. Hirsh, J. B., & Peterson, J. B. Personality and Language Use in Self-Narratives. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 2009. P. 524–527. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.006
12. Jung, C. G. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (R. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968. 451 p.
13. Le Clue, N., & Vermaak-Griessel, J. (2022). Gender and Female Villains in 21st Century Fairy Tale Narratives: From Evil Queens to Wicked Witches. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, 229 p. doi:10.1108/9781801175647
14. Lodi-Smith, J., Geise, A. C., Roberts, B. W. & Robins, R. W. (2009). Narrating Personality Change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3). P. 679–689. doi:10.1037/ a0014611
15. Maas, M. K., & Bonomi, A. E. (2021). Love Hurts?: Identifying Abuse in the Virgin-Beast Trope of Popular Romantic Fiction. Journal of Family Violence, 36(4), P. 511–522. doi:10.1007/ s10896-020-00206-9
16. Mark, M., & Pearson, C. S. (2001). The Hero and the Outlaw: Building Extraordinary Brands through the Power of Archetypes. New York: McGraw-Hill. 384 p.
17. Maslow, A. H. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, vol. 50, no. 4, 1943. P. 370–396. doi:10.1037/h0054346
18. Mollet, T. L. (2020). A Cultural History of the Disney Fairy Tale: Once Upon an American Dream. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 181 p. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50149-5
19. Önal, L. (2011). The Discursive Suppression of Women: Female Evils as the Villains of the Motherhood Narrative. Folklore, 48, P. 85–116. doi:10.7592/FEJF2011.48.onal
20. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1). P. 5–23. doi:10.1080/0951839950080103
21. Schmidt, V. (2007). The 45 Master characters. Cincinnati, Ohio: Writers Digest Books. 298 p.
22. Winter, D. G. (1991). Measuring Personality at a Distance: Development of an Integrated System for Scoring Motives in Running Text. In A. J. Stewart, J. M. Healy, Jr., & D. Ozer (Eds.), Perspectives in Personality: Approaches in Understanding Lives. P. 59–89. London: Kingsley.

Abstract views: 307
PDF Downloads: 545
Published
2023-09-01
How to Cite
Berezhna, M. (2023). WHAT DO WOMEN SPEAK ABOUT: NARRATIVES OF FEMALE CHARACTERS IN MAINSTREAM CINEMA. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 58(3), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.23856/5804
Section
LANGUAGE, CULTURE, COMMUNICATION