A STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT MODEL FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT The Feitoria Prime Market Model – The Competitiveness Concept: MFN Tariff The bilateral trade opportunities Portugal – Poland and Portugal – Ukraine
Abstract
The paper presents an upgrade of the strategic management model for economic development, the Feitoria Prime Market Model (Feitoria Model), developed by Botelho & Kulishov (2018) which has an innovation: the incorporation of the concept of competitiveness of products in markets, the Most-Favored Nation Tariff (MFN Tariff). The Feitoria Model identifies new markets for companies to increase the number of markets to place their product portfolio. Feitoria Model is based on the comparative advantage concept of Ricardo (1817) and incorporates economic and political dimensions in order to avoid unstable economies and the MFN tariff in order to compare the competitiveness of products in multiple markets. The study presents the bilateral trade opportunities, Portugal – Poland and Portugal – Ukraine. The methodology presented below is configured confronting the potential trade to effectively verified among the countries and uses a trade database 2013 – 2017 period extracted from the UN COMTRADE free database.
References
Botelho, J. M. M., & Kulishov, V. (2018). The feitoria prime market model: a case study of bilateral trade opportunities Portugal - Poland. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 27(2), 11-17. DOI: 10.23856/2701. [in English].
Bryson, J. & Edwards, L. (2017). Strategic Planning in the Public Sector. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.128. [in English].
Galvão. (2000). O Nordeste e as negociações multilaterais de comércio: do GATT à OMC. Fortaleza: BNB. [in Portugal].
Kiefer, L. & Carter, S. (2005). Global marketing management: changes. challenges, and new strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [in English].
Love, P. & Lattimore, R. (2009). International Trade. Free, Fair and Open? Paris: OECD Publishing, OECD Insights. [in English].
Myrdal, G. (1956). An international economy. Nova York: Harper and Row Publishers. [in English].
Prebisch, R. (1959). Commercial policy in underdeveloped countries. American Economic Review, Proceedings, vol. 49, No. 2, 251-273. [in English].
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray. [in English].
Steiner, G. (1979). Strategic Planning. What every manager must know. New York: Free Press. [in English].
Topalova, P. (2010). Factor Immobility and Regional Impacts of Trade Liberalization: Evidence on Poverty from India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 2, no. 4, 1-41. [in English].
Vaillant, M. & Ons, A. (2003). Winners and losers in a free trade area between the United States and MERCOSUR. Working Papers, no. 1403. 44p. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ude/wpaper/1403.html. [in English].
World Economic Forum. (2013). Enabling Trade: Valuing Growth Opportunities. [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/global-enabling-trade-2013/a-reducing-supply-chain-barriers-to-trade-could-increase-gdp-up-to-six-times-more-than-removing-tariffs-they-have-been-under-managed-by-both-countries-and-companies/. [in English].
Xavier, L. F. (2009). Comércio potencial versus comércio efetivo: uma análise do aproveitamento das relações entre o Nordeste brasileiro e a União Europeia. (Dissertation. Master in Economics). Recife: PIMES/UFPE. [in Portugal].
Xavier, L. F., Carvalho, R. G., Tenorio Junior, A. J. A., Sousa, E. S., Costa, E. C. (2008). Aproveitamento das relações entre Pernambuco e Portugal: uma análise do comércio potencial versus comércio efetivo. Anais do Fórum BNB de Desenvolvimento e XIII Encontro de Economia Regional. Fortaleza: ANPEC/BNB. [in Portugal].
Abstract views: 402 PDF Downloads: 179