DIASPORA CULTURE: THE MAIN METHODOLOGICAL AND TERMINOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF CULTURE LOGICAL COMPREHENSION

Iryna Haiuk

doi:10.23856/5206

Iryna Haiuk Lviv National Academy of Arts http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1296-0872

Keywords: “Alien”, Armenian, artifact, Bakhtin M., colony, ethnos, diasporian community, dissipative system, Heidegger M.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to justify the necessary of the complex approach to study of the diasporian culture. It is shows that the culture of diaspora usually don`t considered as the original autonomous phenomenon, but only as a small separate marginal part of the native culture. This point of view bases on the outdated ansystem inefficient paradigm of so-called "Island" anthropology. One of the most effective approaches to understanding the essence of culture is theory of dissipative systems. The fact that the theory of dissipative systems not only explains but also proves the naturalness and regularity of the appearance of various branches/ directions of any culture is one of its most important results. Study of the diaspora culture that has been existed during the centuries in another country, it should include research on the entire material sphere of its life, all the artifacts created by its representatives. It is proves the expedience to use iconological method, the approaches of the Actor-Network theory (ANT) and the “Philosophy from below” in this contex. The ANT considers artifacts as active units/ actors of social relations, which make up “sociality”, as well as the principles of "Philosophy from below".

References

1. Assman, Ya. (2004). Kulturnaya pamyat: pismo, pamyat o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost v vysokih kulturah drevnosti [Cultural memory: writing, memory of the ast and political identity in the high cultures of antiquity]. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskoj kultury. [In Russian].
2. Bahtin, M. (1986). Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal reativity]. Moskva: Iskusstvo. [In Russian].
3. Bahtin, M. (1999a). Avtor i geroj v esteticheskoj deyatelnosti. Sobranie sochinenij, t. 1. (s. 69–263) [The author and the hero in aesthetic activity. Collected works]. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskih kultur. [In Russian].
4. Bahtin, M. (1999b). K filosofii postupka. Sobranie sochinenij, t. 1. (s. 7-65) [To the philosophy of action. Collected Works]. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskih kultur. [In Russian].
5. Dvorzhak, M. (2001). Istoriya iskusstva kak istoriya Duha [The history of art as the history of the spirit]. Sankt-Peterburg: Akademicheskij proyekt. [In Russian].
6. Grof, S. (1993). Za predelami mozga [Beyond the brain. Birth, death and transcendence in Psychotherapy]. Moskva: izd-vo Moskovskogo Transpersonalnogo centra. [In Russian].
7. Gadamer, G.-G. (1991). Aktualnost prekrasnogo [The relevance of the beautiful]. Moskva: Iskusstvo. [In Russian].
8. Hajdegger, M. (1993). Veshch. V kn. “Vremya i bytie”. (s. 316-326) [An item. In “Time and being]. Moskva: Respublika. [In Russian].
9. Halbvaks, M. (2007). Socialnye ramki pamyati [Halbwachs, M. The social framework of memory]. Moskva: Novoe izdatelstvo. [In Russian].
10. Korniyenko, N. (2008). Zaproshennya do haosu. Teatr (hudozhnya kultura) i synergetyka. Sproby ne linijnosti [An invitation to chaos. Theater (art culture) and synergetics. Attempts at non-linearity]. Kyiv: NCTM im. Lesya Kurbasa. [In Ukranian].
11. Latur, B. (2006). Novogo vremeni ne bylo. Esse po simmetrichnoj antropologii [There was no new time. An essay on symmetric anthropology]. Sankt-Peterburg:izdatelstvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. [In Russian].
12. Mahlin V. (2018). «Uchastnoe myshlenie». Filosofskij proekt M. M. Bahtina. V “Istorikofilosofskij ezhegodnik” ["Participatory thinking". M. M. Bahtin's philosophical project. Historical and Philosophical Yearbook], t. 33, 267–292. Moskva: institut filosofii RAN. [In Russian].
13. Moren, E. (1995). Utrachennaya paradigma: priroda cheloveka. Per. s franc. M. Sobuckogo [Morin, E. The Lost paradigm. Human nature. Translated from french. M. Sobuckiy]. Kiev: KARME-SINTO. [In Russian].
14. Moren, E. (2011). K propasti. Per. s franc. G. Naumovoj [Morin, E. To the abyss. Translated from french. G. Naumova]. Sankt-Peterburg: Aletejya. [In Russian].
15. Osipyan, A. (b.d.). Etno-konfessionalnye menshinstva v Polskom korolevstve vo vtoroj polovine XIV–pervoj polovine XVII vv.: na primere «gorodskih nacij» Lvova [Ethnoconfessional minorities in the Polish Kingdom in the second half of the XIV – first half of the XVII centuries: on the example of the "urban nations" of Lviv]. Received from: www.hist.msu.ru/Labs/UkrBel/Osipian.doc. [In Russian].
16. Panofskij, E. (1999). Smysl i tolkovanie izobrazitelnogo iskusstva. Stati po istorii iskusstva (Per. s angl. V. Simonova) [The meaning and interpretation of fine art. Articles on the history of art (Translated from the English by V. Simonov)]. Sankt-Peterburg: Gumanitarnoe agenstvo «Akademicheskij proekt». [In Russian].
17. Panofskij, E. (2009). Etyudy po ikonologii: Gumanisticheskie temy v iskusstve Vozrozhdeniya [Studies on iconology: humanistic themes in Renaissance art].Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelskij Dom «Azbuka-klassika». [In Russian].
18. Prigozhin, I., Stengers, I. (2003). Vremya, haos, kvant. K resheniyu paradoksa vremeni [Time, chaos, quantum. To solve the paradox of time]. Moskva: Editorial URSS. [In Russian].
19. Progoff, I. (1966). Ideya Eranosa. V “Religiya i Zdorove” [The idea of Eranos. In “Religion and Health”], t. 5, № 4, 307-313. Received from: www.castalia.ru › articles › ira-progoff-ideyaeranosa. [In Russian].
20. Sorokin, P. (1992). Chelovek. Civilizaciya. Obshestvo [Human. Civilization. Society]. Moskva: Politizdat. [In Russian].
21. Toporov, V. (1993). Vesh v antropocentricheskoj perspective [An item in an anthropocentric perspective. In “Aequinox”]. V “Aequinox”, 70-94. Moskva: Knizhnyj sad, CARTE BLANCHE. [In Russian].
22. Verle, A. (2013). «Ne nasha veshch»: filosofskie zametki k istoricheskoj antropologii identichnosti ["Not our thing": Philosophical notes on the Historical Anthropology of Identity. Metamorphoses of history. Scientific Almanac]. V “Metamorfozy istorii”. Nauchnyj almanah, vyp. 4, 12-29. Pskov: Pskovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. [In Russian].