HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION OF LEGAL NORMS IN THE MODERN PERIOD OF SYSTEMATIC AXIOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION
Abstrakt
The aim of the article is a theoretical and legal analysis of the historical interpretation of law in the context of doctrinal views, its justification and comparison with other theories. Achieving this goal involves: establishing the methodological value of the historical interpretation of law; show the need to follow a historical approach to the interpretation of law. The novelty of the article is to substantiate the practical value of the historical interpretation of law in the modern period of systemic axiological transformation and development of digital technologies. It is proposed to use the historical method of interpretation of legal norms in connection with digitized access to historical sources of law, in particular to the catalog and content of legal principles that were developed in different periods and continue to be the foundation of modern legal systems. The interpretive process gives the judge broad discretion. Voltaire's fear would find expression in the judicial environment if the methods of interpretation of legal norms were weak, applied subjectively or simply exploited in order to achieve the desired goal. Then there would be a real possibility that in some cases the courts would usurp the functions of the legislature and call into question their own legitimacy. Only an accurate interpretation of the text of the law and its implementation in accordance with the intention and purpose of the legislator can regulate social relations and contribute to the development of society and the state. The analysis of the theory of historical interpretation of legal norms shows that the historical- critical analysis of law is interdisciplinary and relies on the growing amount of scientific literature as an approach to teaching and learning. It has been argued that historical approaches to the interpretation of legal norms are useful and effective for studying the relationship between internal and external contextuality in legal research. It is proved that due to the historical reconstruction of the genesis of the rule of law it is possible to explain the main factors, which probably explain the technical and legal features of legal interpretation. The formation of the rule of law in some way depends on socio-economic, political, cultural changes in society at a certain stage of its historical development. Which, in the end, affects our understanding of law and its epistemological consequences. Thus, for an adequate explication of the concept of legal technique of interpretation of legal norms, a relevant conceptual scheme that takes into account its characteristics is required.
Wykaz bibliografii
2. Onyshchuk, I. I. (2013). Tehnika jurydychnogo pys'ma: ponjatijno-kategorial'nyj aparat [Technique of legal writing: conceptual and categorical apparatus]. Visnyk Nacional'noi' akademii' pravovyh nauk Ukrai'ny, 3, 74, 87-94. [in Ukrainian]
3. Shutak, I. D., & Onyshchuk, I. I. (2021). Comprehensive approach to perception of law in the context of doctrinal views. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28, 4, 42-50. DOI: 10.37635/jnalsu.28(4).2021.42-50
4. Onyshchuk, I. I., Onyshchuk, S.V. & Rudenko, O. M. (2020). Conceptual basis of legal monitoring implementation in the system of public administration. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9, 1, 345-353. DOI: 10.7596/taksad.v9i1.2547
5. Zweigert, K. & Kötz H. (2000). Vvedenie v sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava [An Introduction to Comparative Law in Private Law]. 1. M., 480. [in Russian]
6. Kozyubra, M. I. (Ed.) (2015). Zagal'na teorija prava: Pidruchnyk [General theory of law: Textbook]. K.: Waite, 392. [in Ukrainian]
7. Bielska-Brodziak, А. & Tkacz S. (2019). Using Legislative History in Interpreting Polish Law Example of Changes in Uderstanding Principles of Law Durig the Transition Period. AUC IURIDICA, 65, 2, 37-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2019.15
8. Goncharov, V. V. & Rabinovich, P. M. (Ed.) (2013). Dynamichne tlumachennja jurydychnyh norm [Dynamic interpretation of legal norms]. Praci L'vivs'koi' laboratorii' prav ljudyny i gromadjanyna. Naukovo-doslidnogo instytutu derzhavnogo budivnyctva ta miscevogo samovrjaduvannja Nacional'noi' akademii' pravovyh nauk Ukrai'ny. Serija I. Doslidzhennja ta referaty. Vyp. 27. L'viv: SPOLOM, 252. [in Ukrainian]
9. Kryvytskyi, Yu. V. (2012). Istorychnyj sposib tlumachennja norm prava: zagal'noteoretychnyj aspekt [Historical way of interpreting legal norms: general theoretical aspect]. Chasopys Kyi'vs'kogo universytetu prava, 1, 32-36. [in Ukrainian]
10. Elliott C. & Quinn F. (2014). English legal system. Harlow: Pearson, 734.
11. Konstytucijnyj Sud Ukrai'ny (2001). Rishennja vid 16 zhovtnja 2001 roku № 14-rp/2001 [Decision № 14-рп/2001]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/ show/v014p710-01#Text [in Ukrainian]
12. Konstytucijnyj Sud Ukrai'ny (2021). Rishennja vid 14 lypnja 2021 roku № 1-r/2021 [Decision № 1-р/2021]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v001p710-21?find=1&text=%D1%96%D1 %81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80 %D0%B8%D1%87#w1_4 [in Ukrainian]
Abstract views: 130 PDF Downloads: 93