ROLE OF MULTIMODAL METAPHOR IN CONSTRUCTING IMAGE OF CORPORATE LEADER ON BUSINESS MAGAZINE COVERS

Oleksii Dovbnya

doi:10.23856/6403

Oleksii Dovbnya Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8720-5986

Słowa kluczowe: CMT, modality, verbal mode, pictorial mode, multimodal discourse.

Abstrakt

This paper contributes to the relatively nascent field of multi-modal metaphor research, specifically focusing on the manifestation of the given type of metaphors on the covers of business magazines. For the purpose of this study, a sample of covers from prominent business magazines (including Bloomberg Businessweek, Time Magazine, and The Economist) was collected and analyzed. In this research paper, four types of multi-modal metaphors have been distinguished based on the means of encoding source domains and target domains in verbal and pictorial modes. The study was performed within the theoretical framework of critical metaphor analysis. After analyzing the articles, it has been determined that multi-modal metaphors on business magazine covers can be based on image-schema level metaphors such as POWER IS UP as well as more complex domain-level metaphors such as BUSINESS LEADER IS A RELIGIOUS FIGURE. Covers that rely on multi-modal metaphors help to define the personality of a certain magazine.

Wykaz bibliografii

1. Forceville C. 10. Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor. Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext / ed. by N.-M. Klug, H. Stöckl. Berlin, Boston, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099-011 (date of access: 09.05.2024)
2. Zhong Z., Wen S., Chen S. Research trends in multimodal metaphor: a bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023. Vol. 14. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144725 (date of access: 09.05.2024)
3. Carroll N. A note on film metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics. 1996. Vol. 26, no. 6. P. 809–822. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(96)00021-5 (date of access: 09.05.2024)
4. Forceville C. Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought / ed. by R. W. J. Gibbs. Cambridge. P. 462–482. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816802.028 (date of access: 09.05.2024)
5. Tseronis A. From visual rhetoric to multimodal argumentation: exploring the rhetorical and argumentative relevance of multimodal figures on the covers of The Economist. Visual Communication. 2021. Vol. 20, no. 3. P. 374–396. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211005498 (date of access: 09.05.2024)
6. Chapter 3. Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. Applications of Cognitive Linguistics [ACL]. Berlin, New York. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.2.45 (date of access: 09.05.2024)
7. Spiker T (2015) e magazine cover: e cra of identity and impact. In: Abrahamson D and Prior-Miller MR (eds) e Routledge Handbook of Magazine Research: e Future of the Magazine Form. London: Routledge, 377–391.
8. Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Winter B. Horror Movies and the Cognitive Ecology of Primary Metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol. 2014. Vol. 29, no. 3. P. 151–170. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2014.924280 (date of access: 09.05.2024)
10. Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 1997. Angels and Devils in Hell. Elements of Axiological Semantics. Warszawa: Energeia
11. Cian L. Verticality and Conceptual Metaphors: A Systematic Review. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. 2017. Vol. 2, no. 4. P. 444–459. URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/694082 (date of access: 09.05.2024)
12. Stolow J., Meyer B. Enlightening religion: Light and darkness in religious knowledge and knowledge about religion. Critical Research on Religion. 2021. Vol. 9, no. 2. P. 119–125. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032211015276 (date of access: 07.04.2024)
13. Forceville C., Renckens T. The GOOD IS LIGHT and BAD IS DARK metaphor in feature films. Metaphor and the Social World. 2013. Vol. 3, no. 2. P. 160–179. URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1075/msw.3.2.03for (date of access: 09.05.2024)
14. Ortiz M. J. Primary metaphors and monomodal visual metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics. 2011. Vol. 43, no. 6. P. 1568–1580. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.003 (date of access: 09.05.2024)
15. Ortiz M. J., Grima Murcia M. D., Fernandez E. Brain processing of visual metaphors: An electrophysiological study. Brain and Cognition. 2017. Vol. 113. P. 117–124. URL:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2017.01.005 (date of access: 09.05.2024)
16. Ojha A., Gola E., Indurkhya B. Are Hybrid Pictorial Metaphors Perceived More Strongly Than Pictorial Similes? Metaphor and Symbol. 2018. Vol. 33, no. 4. P. 253–266. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1549837 (date of access: 09.05.2024)