ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE FUTURE: HOW TECHNOLOGY WILL CHANGE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF HUMANITY IN 2025

Anna Levitskaia

doi:10.23856/6510

Anna Levitskaia Odesa National Medical University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-3353

Słowa kluczowe: humanity, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, human evolution, ethical implications.

Abstrakt

As we venture into 2025, the intersection of anthropology and technology presents a fascinating frontier for understanding humanity. This article explores the transformative impact of emerging technologies on our perceptions and experiences of being human. Anthropology, traditionally focused on the study of human societies, cultures, and evolutionary development, is now increasingly intertwined with the rapid advancements in technology. (Lytvynova, L. V. 2004) The article delves into the evolution of anthropological studies in the context of technological innovation. Historically, anthropology has provided insights into the cultural and social dynamics of human societies. However, the advent of digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and biotechnology is reshaping these dynamics, prompting anthropologists to reconsider their frameworks and methodologies. The integration of big data analytics, for instance, allows for a more nuanced understanding of human behavior on a global scale, uncovering patterns and trends that were previously elusive. Next, the article examines how technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are revolutionizing anthropological research and education. These immersive technologies enable researchers to recreate and explore ancient civilizations, offering new perspectives on historical and cultural contexts. Moreover, VR and AR provide powerful tools for education, allowing students to engage with anthropological content in more interactive and impactful ways.

Wykaz bibliografii

1. Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture (Vol. 1). Wiley-Blackwell.
2. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (2020). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
3. Haraway, D. (2016). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
4. Kozhina, H. M. (2022). Medical-psychological perspective on the problem of adaptation of junior students to educational activities. English Language Learning in KhNMU: Current State, Problems, and Perspectives, 54.
5. Levitskaia, A. (2024). Freshman syndrome in medical universities: Adaptation and psychology. Scientific Journal of Polonia University Periodyk Naukowy Akademii Polonijnej, 62(1), 170-176.
6. Lytvynova, L. V. (2004). Psychological mechanisms for overcoming maladaptive experiences of first-year students. Thesis. Kyiv: H.S. Kostyuk Institute of Psychology, NAPS Ukraine, 140-146.
7. Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. Bloomsbury Academic.
8. Miller, D., & Horst, H. (2012). The digital and the human: A prospectus for digital anthropology. In H. Horst & D. Miller (Eds.), Digital anthropology (pp. 3-35).
9. Ovsyannikova, V. V. (2014). Features of the adaptation process of first-year students to higher education. Bulletin of Zaporizhzhia National University. Pedagogical Sciences, 2, 179-189.
10. Senft, T. M., & Baym, N. K. (2015). What does the selfie say? Investigating a global phenomenon. International Journal of Communication, 9, 588-606.
11. Yakubovska, I. O., et al. (2013). Risks of developing chronic fatigue and burnout syndromes in medical students in the educational process in higher education institutions depending on individual psychological profile. Galician Medical Journal, 20(4), 60-63.
12. Boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679.