G. BERKELEY & F. MATHEWS “LOGOS” ONTOLOGY

Słowa kluczowe: existence, duality, intelligence, Clip thinking, contemplative thinking,creativity, egocentric perception, compassion.

Abstrakt

The purpose of article’s study is to discover Logos phenomenon which is present in the nature of thinking using an empirical method in the value system of F. Mathews & G. Berkeley from the point of view of modern ethics, historical experience, modern psychology and culture of ecology. “Logos” is considered as a segment of the field of thinking, a certain event in the field of meaning.The meaning of “Logos” as an event in the ontology of F. Mathews is considered from a metaphysical point of view and acquires a special semantic value in the context of G. Berkeley philosophy. In the space-time continuum, “Logos” exists in a moving field of meanings and is opposed to “Nonthought.” In the course of history, the manifestation of “Logos” was absorbed by everyday life and mediocrity, but F. Mathews and G. Berkeley are trying to prevent the disappearance of “Logos” by creating an “Ecological Model of Thinking”, revealing perception from internal semantic structures towards natural phenomena. An ecological model of thinking can prevent the formation of a “perceptual dead zone” where human genius is devalued by self-centered mediocrity. The phenomenon of the integrity of the "Logos" is an ethical expression of intuitive perception.The causes and consequences of "ontological inertia" are also revealed.

Wykaz bibliografii

1. Bakhtina, G.P. (2024). Computerization of society and the problem of "clip thinking". Kyiv: National Technical University of Ukraine.
2. Berkey, G. (1709). Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision. Dublin:Trinity College.
3. Berkeley, G. (1906). Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. Chicago : Open Court Pub. Co., London : Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.
4. Berkeley, G. (1803). Alciphron: or, the Minute Philosopher. New Haven:INCREASE COOKE&Co.
5. Diamond, J. (1995). Easter’s End. Discover Magazine. www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/easters-end
6. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed.New York: Viking&Penguin Group.
7. Hegel , G. W. F. (1910). The Phenomenology of Mind. London: S. Sonnenschein; New York, Macmillan.
8. Kant, I. (1881).Critique of pure reason. London: Macmillan ans Co.731 p.
9. Lem, S. (1961). Solaris. San Diego; New York; London: Harvest Book Harcourt.
10. Maguire, A. (2023). Hostile Environments: Refugees, Asylum Seekers and The Politics of Loneliness. New Formations journal. №109.
11. Mathews, F. (2008). Thinking from Within the Calyx of Nature. Environmental Values. White Horse Press. Vol. 17, №1.
12. Mathews, F. (2007). The World Hidden Within the World. A Conversation on Ontopoetics. Trumpeter – Journal of Ecosophy.Vol. 23 № 1.
13. Seager, W., Matthews, F. (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism. Living Cosmos Panpsychism. New York: Routledge.
14. Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.With an Introduction by Bertrand Russell, F.R.S. London: Routledge& Kegan Paul LTD.

Abstract views: 34
PDF Downloads: 24
Opublikowane
2024-11-05
Dział
INNOWACJA, PRACA, SPOŁECZEŃSTWO