PECULIARITIES OF POLITICAL RATIONALITY IN POSTMODERNISM

Słowa kluczowe: postmodernism, rationality, political rationality, anti-scientism, global political rationality, local political rationality

Abstrakt

In the second half of the twentieth century, the debate intensified that the excessive rationalism of modernism in fact doomed political science to forced self-isolation, the utopian search for root causes, clear interdisciplinary boundaries that would become “monotheistic social orientations.” Once again there is a controversy about the destructive role of rationalism in political theory and practice, the universalization of common ideals. This article considers the phenomenon of postmodernism. As well as the comprehension the nature of the political from the standpoint of different types of political rationality and the main vectors of its development in postmodern political thought. Proponents of the postmodern approach believe that the ideal of total rationality does not correspond to the spirit of humanism, the absolutization of rationalism brings with it the dehumanization of the individual, is a source of global dangers, risks, threats to humanity. From the point of view of postmodernism in the modern era there was no awareness of the absence of structure, and therefore it is permeated with the ideals of general structural organization, the spirit of rationalism, rationalist criticism, the search for common ground, doubt, the atmosphere of resistance.

Wykaz bibliografii

1. Alekseeva E. A. (1991). Racional'nost' i soznanie: istoriko-teoreticheskij ocherk problem osnovaniya racional'nosti [Rationality and consciousness: a historical and theoretical sketch of the problems of the foundation of rationality]. Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika. [in Russian].
2. Gurevich P. S. (1995). Poisk novoj racional'nosti (po materialam trekh vsemirnyh kongressov) // Racional'nost' kak predmet filosofskogo issledovaniya [Search for a new rationality (according to the materials of three world congresses) // Rationality as a subject of philosophical research]. M.: IFRAN. [in Russian].
3. Grobber A. (1990). Between Rationalism and Relativism. On Larry Laudan's Model of Scientific Rationality. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. № 4, 493–507.
4. Il'in I. P. (1998). Postmodernizm ot istokov do konca stoletiya: evolyuciya nauchnogo mifa [Postmodernism from its origins to the end of the century: the evolution of the scientific myth]. M.: Intrada. [in Russian].
5. Krige J. (1998). Science, Revolution and Discontinuity. Brighton: Harvester Press.
6. Liotar Zh.-F. (1998). Sostoyanie postmoderna [The state of postmodernism]. M.: Institute of Experimental Sociology. [in Russian].
7. Porus V. N. (1995). Sistemnyj smysl ponyatiya “nauchnaya real'nost'”. Racional'nost' kak predmet filosofskogo issledovaniya [Systemic meaning of the concept of “scientific reality”. Rationality as a subject of philosophical research]. M.: IFRAN. [in Russian].
8. Rutmanis K. V. (1995). Genezis idej racional'nosti v filosofii. Racional'nost' kak predmet filosofskogo issledovaniya [Genesis of ideas of rationality in philosophy. Rationality as a subject
9. of philosophical research]. M.: IFRAN. [in Russian].

Abstract views: 131
PDF Downloads: 118
Opublikowane
2020-10-05