THE PSYCHOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER THROUGH MILITARY PERSONNEL’S CREATIVE WRITING

Słowa kluczowe: military-poetic discourse, psycholinguistics, self-regulation strategies, combat stress

Abstrakt

The aim of this paper is to study the linguistic markers of manifestation in the modern non-institutional military-poetic discourse of consequences of combat stress, which the Ukrainian army servicemen experienced during military operations. This study focuses on an integrated approach combining pragmatic and cognitive approaches in the framework of discourse analysis. Analysis of the military-poetic discourse has proved that combat stress takes a toll in the poetry of military personnel in the form of signs of the emotional and psychological state, which is taken as post-traumatic stress disorder. These signs are: reference to recurring disturbing dreams (nightmares) and obsessive troubling flashbacks relating to war; a subconscious desire to forget what has happened; persistent negative emotional and psychological state, which manifests itself in negative feelings, moods and emotions such as: depression, anger, rage, hatred, mistrust, resentment, humiliation, letdown, confusion from not understanding what is happening; persistent inability to experience positive emotions; depersonalization; feeling of isolation, alienation from other people; persistent and exaggerated expectations from others, which manifests itself in negative beliefs and/or blaming yourself and others. To protect their psyche from the destructive effects of a traumatic situation, servicemen use such self-regulation strategy as involvement in artistic creativity, in which poetry works as a type of social and psychological rehabilitation. The rewind technique, psychodrama and cognitive restructuring are the most essential elements of self-regulation strategies used by the participants in the Joint Forces Operation.

Wykaz bibliografii

1. Akulshyn O. (2013) Mediavirus yak linhvalno-tekhnohennyi manipuliatyvnyi dyskurs [Mediavirus as a lingual-technogenic manipulative discourse]. Internet-komunikatsiia v diialnosti instytutiv sektoru bezpeky: teoretyko-prykladnyi aspekt – Internet communication in the activities of security sector institutions: theoretical and applied aspect. Lugansk: PP «Vydavnytstvo «Iantar », pp. 152-199. [in Ukrainian]
2. Armenta R.F., Rush T., LeardMann C.A. et al. (2018) Factors associated with persistent posttraumatic stress disorder among U.S. military service members and veterans. BMC Psychiatry, 18, 48. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1590-5 [in English].
3. Blinov O.A. (2016) Psykholohiia boiovoi psykhichnoi travmy [Psychology of combat mental trauma]. Kiev: Talkom [in Ukrainian].
4. Campise, R.L., Geller, S.K., & Campise, M.E. (2006). Combat Stress. In C. H. Kennedy & E.A. Zillmer (Eds.). Military psychology: Clinical and operational applications, 215-240 [in English].
5. Cowie, R., Cornelius, R. (2003) Describing the emotional states that are expressed in speech. Speech Communication, 40(1-2), 5-32. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00071-7 [in English].
6. Dirven R., Polzenhagen F., Wolf H.-G. (2005) Cognitive Linguistics, Ideology, and Critical Discourse Analysis. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0047 [in English].
7. Grandjean, B. T., & Scherer, K. R. (2006) Intonation as an interface between language and affect. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 235-247. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56012-1 [in English].
8. Harré R., Moghaddam F., Cairnie T., Rothbart D., Sabat S. (2009) Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory and Psychology, 19 (1), 5-31. DOI: 10.1177/0959354308101417 [in English].
9. Ishenko N.A. (2007) Voennyj diskurs i diskursivnoe izmerenie vojny [Military discourse and the discursive dimension of war]. Kultura narodov Prichernomorya. Filologicheskie nauki – Culture of the Black Sea peoples. Philological sciences, 116, 22–24 [in Russian].
10. Khraban T. (2019) Psycholinguistic Aspects of the Internet Memes’ Visual Components. Psycholinguistics, 26(2), 341-357. DOI: 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-2-341-357.
11. Khraban T., Khraban I. (2019) Cognitive and Pragmatic Features of the Ukrainian Army Humorous Discourse in Social Media. East European journal of psycholinguistics, 6(2), 21-31. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3637710.
12. Kutkovaya E.S. (2014) Diskurs-analiz emocij i teoriya pozicionirovaniya v issledovanii socialnogo sobytiya [Discourse analysis of emotions and positioning theory in the study of social events]. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya – Psychological studies, 34. URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2014v7n34/958-kutkovaya34.html [in Russian].
13. Mahov A.S., Hramchenko D.S. (2017) Funkcionalno-pragmaticheskie osobennosti sovremennogo amerikanskogo voennogo diskursa SMI [Functional and pragmatic features of modern American military media discourse]. Nauchnyj almanah – Scientific Almanac, 3-2(29), 444-449. DOI: 10.17117/na.2017.03.02.444 [in Russian].
14. McNally R.J. (2005) Remembering trauma. Cambridge: Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press [in English].
15. Ogiyenko I.S. (2012) Dy`skurs ta pidxody` do jogo analizu: poglyady` na problemu suchasny`x anglomovny`x doslidny`kiv [Discourse and approaches to its analysis: views on the problem of contemporary English-speaking researchers]. Naukovi zapy`sky` Nacional`nogo universy`tetu «Ostroz`ka akademiya» – Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy, 23, 98-102 [in Ukrainian].
16. Perlovsky L. I. (2009) Language and cognition. Neural Networks, 22(3), 247-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.03.007 [in English].
17. Proskurin B.M. (2008) Hudozhestvennyj psihologizm do i posle Frejda (russkij i zarubezhnyj opyt) [Artistic psychologism before and after Freud (Russian and foreign experience)]. Filologicheskie zametki – Philological notes, 1. URL: https://philologicalstudies.org › dokumenti › vol1 › 5.pdf [in Russian].
18. Sokolova O.V. (2014) Tipologiya diskursov aktivnogo vozdejstviya: poeticheskij avangard, reklama i PR [Typology of active influence discourses: poetic avant-garde, advertising and PR]. Moscow: Gnozis [in Russian].
19. Ulanov A.V. (2014) Voennyj diskurs russkogo yazyka XIX – nachala XX v. v spektre yazykovoj evolyucii [The military discourse of the Russian language of the 19th – early 20th centuries in the spectrum of language evolution]. Omsk: Izdatelstvo «Litera». URL: lib.sano.ru › cgi-bin › cgiirbis_64 [in Russian].
20. Zhu L. (2016) Language, Emotion and Metapragmatics: A Theory Based on Typological Evidence. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 4(2), 119-134 [in English].

Abstract views: 707
PDF Downloads: 256
Opublikowane
2021-02-12
Dział
JĘZYK, KULTURA, KOMUNIKACJA