TEACHERS’ DISCOURSE: NEUROETHICAL PRINCIPLES

Hanna Truba

doi:10.23856/4911

Hanna Truba Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9944-0476

Słowa kluczowe: communication, types of communication, digitalization, influence, responsibility

Abstrakt

The aim of this paper is to describe two different categories: the teacher discourse and neuroethical principles. New reality of life and general digitalization brings new opportunity not only to students to study any course but also it brings ability to the teachers to worldwide their lessons. Therefore, it faces new challenges and imposes great responsibility for teachers. We all should to find out the new ethical principles. The teachers’ discourse refers to a type of communication that presupposes professional communication between persons belonging to the same group in a professional institution, in the center of which is the discursive activity of representatives of the scientific community, which ensures the embodiment of their intentions and the achievement of a perlocutionary effect. With the aim of transferring professional knowledge and for the intellectual and emotional impact on the addressee, where his essential characteristics reflect the general human, ethnic and interpersonal properties inherent in society and the scientific continuum, implemented within the framework of a social institution. Methods used in the study: general scientific (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction), methods of theoretical research (from abstract to concrete), the method of description.

Wykaz bibliografii

1. Benveniste, E. (2009). Obshchaya lingvistika [General linguistics]. M. Editorial URSS [in Russian].
2. Chizhevskaya M. B. (2011). Kul'turno-istoricheskie osnovy formirovaniya zapadnogo i rossijskogo obshchestvenno-politicheskogo diskursa [Cultural and historical foundations of the formation of Western and Russian socio-political discourse]. Materials of the II International Conference "Alternatives to Regional Development" (Shabunin Readings), Volgograd, October 7-8, [in Russian].
3. Dyck Van T. D. (1989). Yazyk. Poznanie. Soobshchestvo [Language. Cognition. Communication]. M. High School [in Russian].
4. Foucault M. (1996). Arheologiya znanij [Archeology of knowledge]. Kiev [in Russian].
5. Gazzaniga M.S. (2005). The ethical brain. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
6. Hess E., Jokeit H. (2010) Neurocapitalism. Eurozine. Vol. 3.
7. Illes Ju. (2012). Interview with Judy Illes. Trends in Neurosciences. Vol. 35, iss. 9.
8. Kuranova S. I. (2011) Diskurs-analiz kak metod integrativnoj kommunikacii v lingvistike. Takaya dosmotr s inozemnoj filologii [Discourse-analysis as an integrative communication method in linguistics]. Modern research in foreign philology. Issue. 9 [in Ukrainian].
9. Pocheptsov G. G. (1999). Teoriya okommunikacii [Theory of Communication]. Kiev: Vidavnichy Center "Kiev University" [in Russian].
10. Philosophy of Plato [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.plato.spbu.ru/SUMMERSCHOOL/summerschool1/06.htm [in Russian].
11. Romanchenko A. P. (2019). Elitarna movna osobystist u prostory naukovogo dyskursu: komunikatyvny aspect [Elite language personality in the space of scientific discourse: communicative aspects]: monograph. Odessa [in Ukrainian].
12. Safire W. (2002). Visions for a new field of «Neuroethics». Neuroethics: Mapping the Field Conference Proceedings, May 13–14, 2002, San Francisco, California. New York: The Dana Press.
13. Sidorova T.A. (2015). Transinterval'nyj harakter normy v bioetike. Transdisciplinarnost' v filosofii i nauke: podhody, problemy, perspektivy [Transinterval nature of the norm in bioethics. Transdisciplinarity in philosophy and science: approaches, problems, perspectives]. M .: Navigator [in Russian].
14. The new brain sciences: perils and prospects // ed. by D. Rees, S. Rose. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 316 p.
15. Yudin B.G. (2015). Personalizirovannaya medicina kak tekhnonauka. Filosofskie problemy biologii i mediciny: sbornik statej [Personalized medicine as a technoscience. Philosophical problems of biology and medicine: collection of articles]. M .: Navigator, Issue. 9: Standardization and personalization [in Russian].
16. Yudin B.G. (1985). «Uluchshenie» cheloveka: bioeticheskoe otrazhenie za predelami biomediciny [“Improving” the Human Being: Bioethical Reflection Beyond Biomedicine].
Philosophical problems of biology and medicine: materials of the 10th scientific-practical conference, Moscow, October 26-27, 2016 Saratov: SSTU, 2016. Vol. 10 [in Russian].