RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF MENTAL RESILIENCE AS AN ADAPTIVE MECHANISM IN SERVICEMEN
Abstrakt
The article is devoted to the analysis of theoretical approaches and psychological aspects of the study of mental resilience, as one of the factors that helps maintain and restore mental health of the individual and to explore mental resilience as an adaptive mechanism to respond to adverse factors of combat conditions for servicemen. In modern scientific research, resilience distinguishes two main approaches to its understanding: 1) resilience as an individual characteristic (ego-resiliency), a personality trait that protects against the ills of life and is manifested through such qualities as flexibility, agility, ingenuity and strength of character, and also the ability to adapt to functioning in different external conditions; 2) resilience as a dynamic process in which positive adaptation occurs in conditions of trouble. In this sense, resilience is conceptualized as a continuous, active process of emergence or development of new forces and resources of adaptation and recovery, which has uneven dynamics in the face of new risks. The question of whether resilience is a trait or a process is still debated, but there is a common understanding that this concept describes the activities of individuals, families and groups to function, adapt and cope successfully despite psychological, social, cultural and / or physical difficulties. Resilience (as a trait and process) is manifested in people during the continuation of their development.
Wykaz bibliografii
2. Leont'ev D.A. (2003). Ekzistencial'na trevoga i kak s nej borot'sya [Existential anxiety and how to deal with it]. Moskovskij Psihoterapevticheskij ZHurnal, № 2.s. 107-119.
3. Leont'ev D.A. Rasskazova E.I. (2006). Test zhiznestojkosti [Viability test]. Moskow. (in Russian)
4. Ryl'skaya E.A. (2011). K voprosu o psihologicheskoj zhiznesposobnosti cheloveka: konceptual'naya model' i empiricheskij opyt [On the question of the psychological viability of man: a conceptual model and empirical experience]. 107 Psihologiya. ZHurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. T. 8. № 3. S. 9–38.
5. Ano G. G., Vasconcelles E. B. (2005) Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology. V. 61 (4). Р. 461–480.
6. Bowker A. (1993). Sisters in the blood: The education of women in Native America. Newton, MA: WEEA Publishing Center.
7. Dunn D. (1994). Resilient reintegration of married women with dependent children: Employed and unemployed. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
8. Fraser M. W., Richman J. M., Galinsky M. J. (1999). Risk, protection and resilience towards a conceptual framework for social work practice. Social Work Research. V. 23. № 3. P. 131–143.
9. Greff A., Vansteenwegen A., Ide M. (2006). Resiliency in families with a member with a psychological disorder. The American Journal of Family Therapy. V. 34. Р. 285–300.
10. Jackson B. R., Bergeman C. S. (2011). How does religiosity enhance well-being. The role of perceived control. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. V. 3. № 2. Р. 149–161.
11. Kutcher E. J., Bragger J. D., Rodriguez-Srednicki O., Masco J. L. (2010). The role of religiosity in stress, job attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics. V. 95. P. 319–337.
12. Maddi S. R. (2002). The story of hardiness: twenty years of theorizing, research, and practice. Consulting Psychology Journal. V. 54. P. 173–185.
13. Moos R. H. (1995). Development and application of new measures of life stressors, social resources, and coping responses. European J. Of Psychological Assessment. V. 11. № 1. P. 1–13.
14. Pargament K. I., Sweeney P.J. (2011). Building spiritual fitness in the army. American Psychologist. V. 66. № 1. P. 58–64.
15. Rutter M. (1990). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms / M. Rutter. Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology / J. Rolf, A. S. Masten, D. Cicchetti [et al.], eds. – Cambridge ; New York. – P. 181–214.
16. Schuster M. A., Stein B. D., Jaycox L., Collins R. L., Marshall G. N., Elliott M. N., Zhou A. J., Kanouse D. E., Morrison J. L., Berry S. H. (2001).A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, terrorist attacks // The New England Journal of Medicine. V. 345 (20). Р. 1507–1512.
Abstract views: 240 PDF Downloads: 181