POLISH MODEL OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
Abstrakt
In the article, the author examines the Polish model of administrative procedure, its nature, structure, taking as a basis the work of Javier Barnes in which the scientist identifies three generations of administrative procedure with the elements: (1) procedure for adjudication, (2) rule-making procedure, (3) collaborative – making public policy and implementing procedure.) The model of administrative procedure in Poland is normative as it is enshrined in the Code of Administrative Procedure. After analyzing its provisions, the author came to the conclusion that the Polish model of administrative procedure has a pronounced jurisdictional character, which is indicated by the principles of administrative proceedings, the structure of administrative proceedings. The jurisdictional model of administrative procedure in Poland remains dominant; it is characterized by a clear polarization of roles, with a "powerful sovereign" on the one hand and a subordinate citizen on the other. However, the Code reflects the provisions that indicate the partial appearance in the classical model of the administrative procedure of the elements of the third generation, which is associated with convergence and globalization. Poland's membership in the European Union prompted the legislator to introduce new, additional provisions in the Code of Administrative Procedure, concerning, for example, Administrative European Cooperation Section 8a, the principle of the peaceful settlement of Art. 13, the use of mediation in administrative proceedings Art. 96a. The presence of these elements is aimed at overcoming this division, creating a relationship between the parties, according to the principle of horizontal communication. The nature of the jurisdictional model of the administrative procedure is changing towards the regulation of a wide range of activities of bodies in the public sphere. Establishing a permanent system of communication between bodies, and between bodies and citizens "becomes the goal of the administrative procedure. Such changes are in line with the requirements of European Union legislation and the principles enshrined in the Code of Administrative Procedure.
Wykaz bibliografii
2. Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on good administration: (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 June 2007 at the 999bis meeting of the Ministers' Deputies. URL: https://rm.coe.int/cmrec-2007-7-of-the-cm-to-ms-on-good
3. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: November 7, 2000. URL: https://zakon. rada. gov. ua/laws/show/994_524#Text
4. The European Code of Good Administrative Behavior (6 September 2001). URL: https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2003/3/10/1b633730-1555-4b88-ac05-b868ae5cc6ac
5. Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, 2007. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12007L%2FTXT
6. Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego : Ustawa z dnia 14 czerwca 1960 r. ISAP – Internetowy System Aktów Prawnych. URL: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19600300168
7. Barnes, J. (2009). Transforming Administrative Procedure. Towards the third generation of administrative procedures: Paper of Workshop on Comparative Administrative Law, Yale Law School. P. 1-28.
8. Kmiecik Z. R. (2011). Postępowanie administracyjne, postępowanie egzekucyjne w administracji i postępowanie sądowoadministracyjne. Warszawa. P. 53, 61.
9. J. Itrich-Drabare (2018). Encyklopedia administracji publicznej, Elipsa, Warszawa, P. 45.
10. Kmieciak Z. (2009). Postępowanie administracyjne i sądowoadministracyjne a praw europejskie. Warszawa. P. 228.
11. J. Barnes, Transforming administrative procedures, Yale, 2009. P. 32
Abstract views: 287 PDF Downloads: 154