INTERNET COMMUNICATION IN MODERN INFORMATION SOCIETY

Słowa kluczowe: information society, communication, latest information technologies, Internet communication, mass communication, a dialogic society, virtuality, a mass society

Abstrakt

Basing on the examination of sufficient amount of scientific literature, the article attempts to define the concept and highlight the characteristics of the information society. It is proved that the information society is a qualitatively new historical stage of civilizational development. It is argued that the information society is based on the global spread of information and communication technologies, the fundamental processes of mass generation, processing, transmission, and use of information. It is established that the information environment contributes to a significant increase in the impact of information and knowledge on all areas of human activity. The substantiation of the paradigm of communication in the information society and its implementation with the help of the newest information technologies of the Internet is given. The peculiarities of the functioning of Internet communication in the information society are studied. It is substantiated that such communication has specific features, provides some training, establishes unique implementation forms, and actualizes the dialogic nature of a society.

Wykaz bibliografii

1. Charles Horton Cooley, (1909) «The Significance of Communication». Chapter 6 in Social Organization. New York: Charles Scribnerʼs Sons, (pp. 61‒65). Retrieved from https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Cooley/Cooley_1909/Cooley_1909_06.html [in the USA].
2. Efremova, A.A. (2017) Ynternet-kommunykatsyia kak sredstvo mobylyzatsyy obshchestva [Internet-communication as a means of a society mobilization]. Mezhdunarodnыi studencheskyi nauchnыi vestnyk, 1. Retrieved from https://eduherald.ru/ru/article/view?id=16861 [in Russian].
3. Klymanska, L.D. Komunikatyvni tekhnolohii modeliuvannia politychnoho prostoru v demokratychnomu suspilstvi [Communicative technologies for modelling political space in a democratic society]. Retrieved from www.democracy.kiev.ua/publications/collections/conference_2005 [in Ukrainian].
4. Nemesh, O.M. (2017) Virtualna diialnist osobystosti: struktura ta dynamika psykholohichnoho zmistu [Virtual activity of the individual: the structure and dynamics of psychological content]. Kyiv: Slovo [in Ukrainian].
5. Petkun, S.M. (2019) Informatsiino-komunikatyvna kompetentnist osobystosti v umovakh hlobalizatsii [Information and communicative competence of the individual in the context of globalization]. Informatsiia, komunikatsiia ta upravlinnia znanniamy v hlobalizovanomu sviti, (pp. 50–51). Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Lira-K [in Ukrainian].
6. Politanskyi, V. (2017) Kontseptualni idei rozvytku informatsiinoho suspilstva [Conceptual ideas for the development of the information society]. Teoriia derzhavy i prava, 4, 140‒144 [in Ukrainian].
7. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro Osnovni zasady rozvytku informatsiinoho suspilstva v Ukraini na 2007–2015 roky» [On the Basic Principles of Information Society Development in Ukraine for 2007-2015] (2007). Vidom. Verkhov. Rady Ukrainy, 12, 137 [in Ukrainian].
8. Skyba, O.P. (2019) Internet-komunikatsii v informatsiinomu suspilstvi: sotsiokulturnyi aspekt [Internet communications in the information society: sociocultural aspect]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho aviatsiinoho universytetu. Seriia: Filosofiia. Kulturolohiia, 2 (30), 173–177 [in Ukrainian].
9. Sokovnyna, V.V. (2014) Lynhvokreatyvnost vzrosloho myra: yhrы v «sotsyalnoi sety» [Linguocreativeness of the adult world: games in the «social network»]. Uralskyi fylolohycheskyi vestnyk, 2, 96–100 [in Russian].
10. Chumykov, A.N., & Bocharov, M.P. (2006) Sviazy s obshchestvennostiu: teoryia y praktyka [Public Relations: Theory and Practice] (3nd ed., rev.). M.: Delo [in Russian].
11. John Suler, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Rider University 1996-98 Dzh. Suler, (2005) Liudy prevrashchaiutsia v Эlektronykov: Osnovnыe psykholohycheskye kharakterystyky vyrtualnoho prostranstva [People turn into Elektroniks: The main psychological characteristics of virtual space] (O. Vovk, Trans). SPb.: Norynt. Retrieved from http://flogiston.ru/articles/netpsy/electronic [in the USA].
12. Masuda, Y. (1983) The Information Society as Postindustrial Society. Wash. World Future Society [in the USA].
13. Petryk, V., Prysiazhniuk, M., Kompantseva, L., Skulysh, E., Boyko, A., & Ostrouhov, V. (2011) Suggestive technology manipulative influence: teach. guidances. K.: JSC «VIPOL» [in Ukrainian].
14. Reddick, C.G. (2009) Handbook of Research on Strategies for Local E-government Adoption and Implementation. IGI Global [in the USA].
15. Byriukova, E.A. (2014). Ynternet-kommunykatsyia kak sredstvo mezhkulturnoho obshchenyia: zhanrovыe y yazыkovыe osobennosty [Internet-communication as a medium of intercultural education: genre and language personality]. Yazыk. Slovesnost. Kultura, 6, 75–98 [in Ukrainian].
16. Tokareva, N.M, Shamne, A.V., & Khalik, O.O. (Ed.) (2017). Variatyvnist cotsializatsii osobystosti v umovakh suchasnoho informatsiinoho suspilstva [Variability of socialization of personality in the conditions of modern information society]. Kyiv: TOV NVP «Interservis» [in Ukrainian].
17. Hrymov, O.A. (2015) Sotsyokulturnыe praktyky lychnosty v sotsyalnыkh setiakh [Sociocultural practices of personality in social networks]. Candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
18. Denysiuk, Zh.Z. (2016) Internet-komunikatsiia yak trend povsiakdennykh sotsialnykh praktyk [Internet communication as a trend of everyday social practices]. Kultura i suchasnist, 1, 27‒31 [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 228
PDF Downloads: 190
Opublikowane
2022-08-30
Dział
JĘZYK, KULTURA, KOMUNIKACJA