NEOPROTECTIONISM IN WORLD AGRARIAN POLICY: IMPACT ON THE UKRAINIAN AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
Abstrakt
The main stages of development of neoprotectionism are considered in the article,the basic methods and mechanisms of protection of national interests in agrarian policy ofdifferent countries of the world are analyzed. The consequences of the world policy of neo –protectionism on the development of the agrarian branch of Ukraine are studied. In general,the article examines the formation of modern models of economic development based onneoprotectionism. As international experience shows, the use of neo-protectionist measuresto protect domestic producers and conquer new markets, they have both positive and negativeeffects, it all depends on the term of their application.The aim of the study is to identify current trends in neo-protectionism in worldagricultural policy. Theoretical and methodological basis of the study were economic theoriesof protectionist doctrine, theories of state regulation of the economy, the work of domesticand foreign economists on economic policy and state regulation of economic processes,management of foreign economic activity aimed at restoring the country's foreign tradebalance. The following methods were used in the research process: historical, abstract-logical,comparison, methods of economic analysis.The agricultural sector is a guarantor of food security of the country, as well as adriving force for innovation in production processes. The agricultural sector in terms ofthe introduction of new technologies and innovations is quite developed, this applies toboth technological innovation and the introduction of IT technologies in management andanalytics, etc. Thus, support for agricultural production not only guarantees their own foodsecurity, but also gives impetus to the development of other sectors of the economy, which inturn increase the productivity of agricultural production and its competitiveness. Therefore,the developed countries of the world build their agrarian policy, first of all, focusing on theirown producer, protection of national interests and natural resources, as well as, the conquestof world markets.Analysis of the development of agrarian policy in different countries shows that theprotection of national interests at the beginning of the most developed economies of the worldand was the prerequisite that enabled the economic growth of these countries. Thus, developingcountries, including Ukraine, must pursue a policy of neo-protectionism in order to stabilizetheir economies, become competitive, and give impetus to its growth. And this, in the beginning,is impossible without state support and protection. After all, the sometimes aggressive policyof the already developed countries of the world does not allow the formation of its ownproduction, which needs time to increase the pace of development. This requires a national andinternational policy in which preferences will initially be given to Ukrainian producers, thisrequires the use of regulatory mechanisms, under which only national producers can participatein public procurement, and through diplomatic and trade-industrial representations to promotetheir own manufacturer, and open world markets for Ukrainian producers. Especially during the war, food security issues are very important for Ukraine, so theagricultural sector of the economy needs significant support to provide food for its own citizensand countries that are dependent on Ukrainian agricultural products. Thus, the threat loomed notonly over Ukraine, but also over the world, regarding a possible famine. Thus, the protection andsecurity of the national producer is an important component of ensuring international food security.
Wykaz bibliografii
2. Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA). WTO. Retrieved from: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc_e/gp_gpa_e.htm.
3. Balassa, B. (1978). “The New Protectionism and the International Economy”. Journal of World Trade Law, Vol. 12, No. 5 (World Bank Reprint Series: Number Seventy), 422-436.
4. Clift, J., Woll, C. (2012). “Economic patriotism: reinventing control over open markets”. Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 19 (3), 307-323. Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13501763.2011.638117.
5. China Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation. (2020). OECD iLibrary (oecd-ilibrary.org). Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/049d4bd3-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/049d4bd3-en.
6. Common agricultural policy funds. An official website of the European Union. European Commission. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/key-policies/common-agricultural-policy/financing-cap/cap-funds_en#overview.
7. Donald Trump’s Inaugural address: “The Lord will protect us”. (2017). News and analytics from the world of politics: assessments, forecasts, comments. DW. Retrieved from: https://www.dw.com/uk/%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B3%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%96%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0-%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BF%D0%B0-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81-%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%85%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C-%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%8C/a-37216930.
8. Eder, J. (2019). “Progressive Protectionism – An Oxymoron or a Viable Development Strategy for Europe?”. Department of Politics and Development Research, Institute of Sociology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, / Working Paper for the AFEP-IIPPE Conference Envisioning the Economy of the Future and the Future of Political Economy 3 rd – 5 th July 2019, Lille. Retrieved from: https://afep-iippe2019.sciencesconf.org/248892/document.
9. Fallows, J. (1993). “How the world Works”. The Atlantic Monthly. – P. 82. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1993/12/how-the-world-works/305854/.
10. Ferrini, L. (2012). “What are the Main Causes and Effects of Economic Protectionism?”. E-International Relations. Retrieved from: https://www.e-ir.info/2012/08/28/the-causes-andeffects-of-economic-protectionism.
11. Galasyuk, V. V. (2017). “Zaprovadzhennia bahatofaktornoi modeli otsinky tendernykh propozytsii v publichnykh zakupivliakh ukrainy”. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky. Mykolaivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni V.O. Sukhomlynskoho. Vyp. 20., S. 108-113. Retrieved from: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/20-2017/23.pdf [in Ukrainian].
12. Gerasymchuk, V. G. (2016). “Doktrynalni osnovy svitovoi torhivli produktsiieiu promyslovosti: protektsionizm i frytrederstvo” [Doctrinal foundations of world trade in industrial products: protectionism and free trade] Ekonomichnyi visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrainy "Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut". – № 13. – S. 79-85. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/evntukpi_2016_13_14 [in Ukrainian].
13. Holobiuc, A. (2017). “Does the European Union Pursue a Neo-Protectionist Trade Policy?” THEMARKETFORIDEAS, No 5-6, Retrieved from: http://www.themarketforideas.com/does-the-european-union-pursue-a-neo-protectionist-trade-policy-a359/ [in Ukrainian].
14. Lazanska, T. I. “Protektsionizm”. Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy. Instytut istorii ukrainy Natsionalna akademiia nauk Ukrainy. Retrieved from: http://www.history.org. ua/?termin=Protektsionizm [in Ukrainian].
15. Monroe, S. L. (2018). “Boundaries of Protectionism: Ethnic Politics and Elite Bargains in the Neo-Liberal Era”. Retrieved from: https://www.internationalpoliticaleconomysociety.org/sites/default/files/paper-uploads/2018-10-30-13_32_39-smonroe@princeton.edu.pdf.
16. OECD, (2021). Data, Agricultural Support. Internet Source. Retrieved from: https://data.oecd.org/agrpolicy/agricultural-support.htm.
17. Panchenko, V., Bulatova, O. (2018). “Neo-protectionism as a challenge to the liberal regulation”. Visnyk Mariupolskoho derzhavnoho universytetu seriia: Ekonomika. Vyp.16. – S. 86-93. Retrieved from: http://194.44.12.92:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3992 [in Ukrainian].
18. Panchenko, V., Reznikova N. (2017). “Vid protektsionizmu do neoprotektsionizmu: novi vymiry liberalnoho rehuliuvannia”. Mizhnarodna ekonomichna polityka. № 2. – S. 95-117. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Mep_2017_2_6 [in Ukrainian].
19. Panchenko, V. (2018). “Formy proiavu neoprotektsionizmu v politytsi ekonomichnoho patriotyzmu: analiz suchasnoho dosvidu rozvynenykh krain u stymuliuvanni ekonomichnoho zrostannia”. Ekonomichna nauka Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid. № 4/2018. – S. 27-32. Retrieved from: http://www.investplan.com.ua/pdf/4_2018/6.pdf [in Ukrainian].
20. Pro skhvalennia Vseokhopliuiuchoi stratehii implementatsii Hlavy IV (Sanitarni ta fitosanitarni zakhody) Rozdilu IV “Torhivlia i pytannia, poviazani z torhivleiu” Uhody pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym Spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony. (2016). [On approval of the Comprehensive Implementation Strategy of Chapter IV (Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures) of Chapter IV “Trade and Trade-Related Issues” of the Association Agreement between Ukraine, of the one part, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, on the other hand]. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine; Strategy dated 24.02.2016 № 228-r "Comprehensive strategy for the implementation of legislation on sanitary and phytosanitary measures". Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/228-2016-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
21. Pro Derzjavnuy byudjet Ukrainy na 2022 rik Zakon Ukrainy. (2021). [Law of Ukraine on the State Budget of Ukraine for 2022]. Biudzhet, Rozpodil, Perelik vid 02.12.2021 № 1928-IX. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1928-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
22. Pro skhvalennia Stratehii rozvytku eksportu produktsii silskoho hospodarstva. kharchovoi ta pererobnoi promyslovosti Ukrainy na period do 2026 roku. (2019). [On approval of the Strategy for the development of exports of agricultural products, food and processing industry of Ukraine for the period up to 2026]. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine; Strategy, Plan, Measures of July 10, 2019 № 588-r. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/588-2019-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
23. Rainert, E. (2017). Ozvuchyv sekret ekonomichnoho uspikhu dlia Ukrainy [He voiced the secret of economic success for Ukraine]. Obozrevatel.ua. Retrieved from: https://www.obozrevatel.com/finance/business-and-finance/06849-erik-rajnert-ovuchiv-sekretekonomichnogo-uspihu-dlya-ukraini.htm [in Ukrainian].
24. Raizberh B.A., Lozovskyi L.Sh., Starodubtseva E.B. (1999). Sovremennyi ekonomycheskyi slovar [Modern Economic Dictionary]. 2-e yzd., yspr. M.: YNFRA-M. 479 s.
25. Rawlinson, P. (2019). “Confronting neo-mercantilism: why regulation is critical to global trade”. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/confronting-neo-mercantilism-regulation-critical-global-trade-tariff/.
26. Shaffer, G., Fleurbaey, M. (2020). Adapting trade policy to social, environmental, and development goals / Social cohesion, global governance and the future of politics. University of California, Irvine and IPSP, Princeton University and IPSP. Retrieved from: https://www.g20-insights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/TF8-8.6-Reconceiving-Trade-Agreements-policybrief-v4-1.pdf.
27. Schwab, K. (2017). “Rise of Global Protectionism: Natural Economic Development Round or Step Back as a Necessary Effective Policy-Making Tool?”. Polemics, The Magazine of the Diplomatic Academy of Vienne. Retrieved from: http://www.polemics-magazine.com/econ/riseof-global-protectionism-natural-economic-development-round-or-step-back-as-a-necessaryeffective-policy-making-tool.
28. Uhoda pro Asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z insho...; Uhoda, Spysok, Mizhnarodnyi document. (2014). [Association Agreement between Ukraine, of the one part, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the other part]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011#Text [in Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 201 PDF Downloads: 127