SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION STRATEGIES IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROCESSES IN UKRAINE
Abstrakt
Modern requirements for companies and consumers include the stability of financial performance amid increasing environmental attractiveness. Companies need to cover such seemingly diverse interests as profitability for owners, concern for staff, interest for partners and consumers, actions for environmental protection. It is essential to consider the growing role of conscious consumption, which is a direct regulator of production activity. The aim is to formulate a strategy and recommendations for combining sustainable initiatives in production and consumption in the context of European integration processes in Ukraine. The research object is sustainability in production and consumption. The article proposes a strategy that combines sustainable production and sustainable consumption into one cluster. It will allow sustainable initiatives are focused on systemic changes and essential areas of production and consumption. The practical value of the approach is in a strategy that includes measures stimulating environmental and socio-economic policy of production. It will allow moving from relative disunity of actions to technological standards. The proposed strategy can be implemented in recommendations for improving programs on changing behaviour from a gradual transition from individual consumers to broader initiatives to change the entire system – production and consumption. Today, this is especially important, including for Ukraine, considering its transition to sustainability and the implementation of sustainable development goals in the sphere of sustainable production and consumption. Also, we outlined directions for further research in the policy of sustainable production and consumption in the context of European integration processes in Ukraine.
Wykaz bibliografii
2. Borysenko, О.M., Ivashura, А. A. (2021). Analiz ekousvidomlenoi kharchovoi povedinky yak faktora formuvannia ekolohichnoi stalosti [Analysis of eco-conscious food behavior as a factor of ecological sustainability formation]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia “Ekolohiia” − Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University series “Еcоlogy”, 25, 101-110 [in Ukrainian].
3. Buchholz, H., Eberle, T., Klevesath, M., Jürgens, A., Beal, D., Baic, A., Radeke, J. (2020). Forward Thinking for Sustainable Business Value: A New Method for Impact Valuation Sustainability, 12 (20), 8420.
4. Evans, A., Strezov, V., Evans, T. J. (2009). Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13 (5), 1082-1088.
5. Gray, R.H. (1994). Corporate Reporting for Sustainable Development: Accounting for Sustainability in 2000AD. Environmental Values, 3, 17-45.
6. Haupt, M., Hellweg, S., (2019). Measuring the environmental sustainability of a circular economy. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 1-2, 100005.
7. Ivashura, А., Borysenko, О., Savchenko, M., Ditinenko, S. (2021). Analiz staloho spozhyvannia i vyrobnytstva v Ukraini [Analysis of sustainable consumption and production in Ukraine]. Hraal nauky − Grail of Science, 9, 198-204 [in Ukrainian].
8. Ivashura, A., Borysenko, O., Tolmachova, M. (2021). Stala kharchova povedinka [Sustainable eating behavior]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu «KhPI». Seriia: Novi rishennia u suchasnykh tekhnolohiiakh – Bulletin of the National Technical University “KhPI”. Series: New solutions in modern technology, 4(10), 88-93 [in Ukrainian].
9. Mähönen, J. (2020). Comprehensive Approach to Relevant and Reliable Reporting in Europe: A Dream Impossible? Sustainability, 12 (13), 5277.
10. Müller, F., Burkhard, B. (2012). The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 1, 26-30.
11. Pham, D. C., Do, T. N. A., Doan, T. N., Nguyen T. X. H. & Pham T. K. Y. (2021). The impact of sustainability practices on financial performance: empirical evidence from Sweden. Cogent Business & Management, 8, 1.
12. Protasenko, O. F. (2018). Doslidzhennia y analiz pokaznykiv ekolohichnosti robochoho seredovyshcha [Research and analysis of indicators ecofriendliness of working environment]. Komunalne hospodarstvo mist – Municipal economy of cities, 7(146), 127-132 [in Ukrainian].
13. Protasenko, O. F., Ivashura, А. А. (2016). Ekolohichnist robochoho mistsia i prostoru [Ecofriendlyness of a workplace and workspace]. Otkryityie informatsionnyie i kompyuternyie integrirovannyie tehnologii − Open information and computer integrated technologies, 73, 118-126 [in Ukrainian].
14. Protasenko, O. F., Ivashura, А. А. (2018). Rol ekolohichnosti seredovyshcha u stvorenni bezpechnykh umov diialnosti liudyny [The Role of Ecofriendlyness of the Environment in Creating Safe Conditions for Human Activity]. Otkryityie informatsionnyie i kompyuternyie integrirovannyie tehnologii − Open information and computer integrated technologies, 80, 210-216 [in Ukrainian].
15. Quartey, E. T., Tosefa, H., Danquah, K. A. B., & Obrsalova, I. (2015). Theoretical framework for plastic waste management in Ghana through extended producer responsibility: case of sachet water waste. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12 (8), 9907-9919.
16. Söderholm, P. (2020). The green economy transition: the challenges of technological change for sustainability. Sustain Earth, 3, 6.
17. Toth-Szabo, Z., Várhelyi, A. (2012). Indicator Framework for Measuring Sustainability of Transport in the City. Procedia − Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 2035-2047.
18. Van Zanten, J. A., van Tulder, R. (2021). Analyzing companies’ interactions with the Sustainable Development Goals through network analysis: Four corporate sustainability imperatives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 2396-2420.
19. Villamagna, A. M., Angermeier, P. L, Bennett, E. M. (2013). Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecological Complexity, 15, 114-121.
Abstract views: 186 PDF Downloads: 119
